X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 141806 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON POLLUT
ISSN0269-7491
E-ISSN1873-6424
h-index194
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.301.9681.805
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Toxicology
Q17 / 116
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Pollution
Q110 / 120
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q114 / 128

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-pollution/#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ENVPOL
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1987
Annual Article Volume1615
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0269-7491%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 7.8 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: Write a review
Author: 路过


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-10 10:38:30
submitted out, because the format, the effective number does not match, changed three times, after being thrown out, was rejected, because the content does not match.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 路过

Author: 一叶一枯荣


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-05 15:27:14
Real-time impact factor: 5.086.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 一叶一枯荣

Author: 写不出用户名了


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-23 19:51:12
Reviewers are very meticulous, and the opinions given are pertinent; the journals have requirements for novelty and workload, and the editors have patience. During the overhaul, they apply for delay, and the editors respond quickly.After two overhauls (each appraisal in about 1 month), a minor repair, received.2016-8-16 submit2016-8-22 under review2016-9-28 major revision The overall opinion of the two reviewers is quite positive and needs additional data.2016-10-16 submit2016-11-14 major revision Data format adjustment, additional literature discussion; because of other things, no time to draft, apply delay for two weeks2017-01-01 submit2017-02-06 minor revision Additional literature discussion, detail modification2017-02-13 submit2017-02-22 accept minor repair has not been approved, directly receive
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | 写不出用户名了

Author: HNYL


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-17 08:26:14
Personal feelings: (1) requires a large amount of data, innovative; (2) the review time dragged a bit long, may be difficult for reviewers to find; (3) requirements for EnglishGao; (4) has been selectd many times before, and has been rejected many times, everyone must have patience.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | HNYL

Author: Joyce


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-04 09:33:28
is written in terms of air pollution. It has 2 months in the first instance and is relatively long. It is hard to change the three review comments.However, after a month of revision, it was directly acceptd, and it took more than three months to receive, but the journal was very slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Joyce

Author: 631366314@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-31 17:47:17
has submitted a total of 3 times, the first two editorial reviews failed, and can only be changed to other journals.The third submission was a EST rejection paper, which was revised in detail based on the reviewer's comments.It is very efficient. It was submitted on March 25, and it was received in one and a half months. After half a month, it was revised back and received the next day.Individuals' evaluation of this paper is not as high as the amount of gold that was rejected by the editors before being submitted to the EP, but the papers are new enough and the data supports opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 631366314@qq.com

Author: better


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-12 09:57:28
has selectd for 3 articles, and two articles were rejected.Those who were rejected were not sent directly by the editorial department, one week before and after.Insufficient innovation and routine local inspection are difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | better

Author: better


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-12 09:57:20
has selectd for 3 articles, and two articles have been rejected.Those who were rejected were not sent directly by the editorial department, one week before and after.Insufficient innovation and routine local inspection are difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | better

Author: hwang_118@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-04-21 19:52:32
After the select, the editor-in-chief is in the editor. After one day, the editor has assigned a deputy editor, and the status is decision in process.Is this normal? Is this waiting for the trial or the deputy editor is making the decision?!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hwang_118@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-10 10:07:00
has certain requirements for innovation, and the Local interesting routine monitoring article is not very good.You need to submit a summary of the article to the editor first. This process may take a little longer.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-07 13:00:00
6 Submitted in mid-month, minor in mid-August, and acceptd in early September.The summary pre-audit time is longer, and it is urged twice to notify that it can be submitted.The editor is more responsible and the review period is shorter.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-22 13:10:00
was approved, and the official submission was made on October 5th. After waiting for two months, the status changed once, thinking that the review was over, but it changed again.In under review.So I waited for another two months, and finally received a rejection letter on February 9, the second year of the second year.A total of five reviewers were found. The previous two opinions were very different, so it took another two months to find someone else, and finally refused because of lack of innovation.Editors and reviewers are very responsible, giving good advice, but the time is a little longer.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-29 13:39:00
Need to pre-inject the summary, it is best to send it directly to the editor. The editor will select the appropriate assistant according to the direction of your article. My summary is reviewed for one month...The editor explained that it was a meeting. Listening to others said that the general summary should be reviewed for 1-2 weeks. After the abstract is over, go to the website to select for the full text. Although there is a limit of 5,000 words, it is not very strict.After one and a half months of trial, the two reviewers, the first trial results were overhauled and changed for nearly two months; the second trial was less than one month, and the result was a minor change, then changed for three weeks, returned, accepted one week later, and the overall feeling was edited.The attitude is still good, that is, the reply is not timely, and the editor is relatively cold.The impact factor has a 3.7 this year, the environment is not bad, although it can not compare EST, WR but than ETC, Chemosphere this
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-24 15:49:00
sent a few emails, the summary of the pastIgnore, the editor is too jerk.There was no way to change the Chemosphere and accept it after 6 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-17 16:53:00
Submission summary The reply was given in the past week or so, but is it officially submitted for 10 days or is it normal with the editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-13 21:14:00
just selectd for Science of the Total Environment, the editor said that the layout is limited, it is recommended to change the select, I want to select for EP, before I sent a copy in the Environmental Science and Pollution Reasch, I want to change the high pointTry it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-04 19:04:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com ... lution/#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-02 12:22:00
Reviewing speed is very fast, at the end of FebruaryIn the first half of April, he returned to review the comments. The overhaul gave him two months. In the middle, he wrote a thesis defense and went back to the end of May. He returned to the second review in less than one month. There were several grammar problems.In general, EP is still relatively fast. The first article from submission to acceptance is almost 3 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-06 14:44:00
This journal has been reviewed very quickly. It has been news for one and a half months and it has been given for two months.Modify the time, change it back in one month, and accept it after one week.Very good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-23 16:20:00
Environmental comprehensive journal, with an impact factor of 3.4 or so, and its influence is also very good.More powerful than hazardous waste.The language requirements depend on the reviewer.Innovative and application articles are fine.In addition to EST and WR, maybe it is EP, maybe there are one or two before the EP, not sure.I am talking about the comprehensive environment class.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-18 10:53:00
has submitted two abstracts, which are rejected for the following reasons: If the research area is limited to a certain place, it is of a research nature.Very strange, I have seen that the journal recently published a similar article, and then it will not work.And I can't feel it with just one abstract, sweat one.Recently, however, I tried a feat that directly submitted the article without submitting the abstract in advance, and the editor was returned to the trial, and it was successfully acceptd, 嘎嘎
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-14 15:37:00
IF=3.86
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-10 17:38:00
This journal is still good in the environment, reviewing the manuscriptThe cycle is generally 2-4 months, the language requirements are not very strict, before the select, you need to give the editor pre-audit before you can select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-20 10:10:00
The article is the chemosphere that started to select, and was directly rejected, saying that the direction is not suitable.The EP was changed, and the review speed was very fast. The revised opinion was given in one month, and it was repaired in half a month and received the next day.I feel that the language and format requirements are not very strict, and the submission period is short.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-29 18:47:00
Personal experience (1) This journal requires a summary review before it can be submitted through the system.(2) The cover letter must indicate which editorial review summary.(3) Must write highlight, highlight 3-5 sentences (that is, the key point of the article), each sentence does not exceed 85 characters.(4) The title of the diagram and table must be the same as the article, using a single document.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service