Environmental Earth Sciences

Submitted on May 17, 2012, received on June 1, 2013!After a major overhaul, two minor repairs!I encountered a perverted reviewer and changed the editor in the middle. The original editor did not work. The journal needs to be frequently drafted. I have tried three or four times and the attitude is very good. After the draft, the effect is remarkable!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted in September last year, and then returned to the review comments after March, because the work is busy, so the return is very slow (the day before the deadline), and then waited for about 3Month, after receiving the minor, the last is in April, so it is still very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After posting, the status stays in "UnderConsideration", after 2 months urged the editor, edit the reply, indicating as soon as possible.After returning an opinion, minor repairs can be.The current revision has been returned and I hope to receive it as soon as possible.The time so far is about six months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11 On the 15th of the month, I sent a few abstracts in the past and I plan to send a special issue. On December 4th, I replied that I can cooperate, and I am very optimistic about the research.I was overjoyed, but when I saw your comments, my heart began to fall again.So many articles, one article of trial, I don’t know how long it will be published.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Published in May 2011, and has been with editor after three months. After three months, I sent a reminder letter, the editor is very good, the reply has been submitted for review, under review, DecemberThe initial review, major revision because the paper is a review, the reviewer first certainly makes sense, but always feel that the language has problems, and then some personal evaluation of the review.The reviewer directly asked questions in the review format in the text, about 20 or so, and about 10 question marks.After receiving the review comments, I was crazy, I never encountered such a review, how to reply?Therefore, one push and then push, originally required to be repaired on January 19, the results are unanimous, do not know how to deal with.Most

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted in early August last year, has been with editor, reminder editor at the end of October, 10.31 for review, 11.11under consideration, until April this year, a reminder letter sent, review comments back...Language overhaul, 5.2 submitted revised draft, under consideration, 7.8 acceptance.It feels slower and must be drafted...

(2) Thank | Anonymous

This journal really wants to be. I submitted it on April 28, 2011. After waiting for 3 months, I sent a letter to the editor. The editor said that he is not doing it there. Let meAsk another person, then I wrote a letter to the new editor, saying that I forgot, I will arrange the manuscript to enter the review process immediately, and then wait, wait two months before I have not submitted for review, I wrote a letter requesting rejection, the editorSaid that the review has been arranged, will change the status of the paper.Then there was no management, and I waited until January 18, 2012 to wait for the rework advice and overhaul.After a week, I went back to repair, and then I didn't have a message. I went to repair on May 17 for the second time. Minor repair, I asked for a few words to receive.I returned to repair on May 18th, and I have been staying at "Under consideration". Yesterday

(5) Thank | Anonymous

What journal, slow to die...Overhaul once, minor repair twice, one year...not yetThe result is still under consideration... I don't know what it means...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is a bit perverted, and there are papers received in 2010, and I haven't given the page number yet. I really served

(0) Thank | Anonymous

should have an impact factor of 1 in 2011!It is very slow to review the manuscript temporarily, but as a general journal, you can!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The speed of the first trial is still relatively fast, but it is too slow to go back after the modification. Waiting for the emergency

(0) Thank | Anonymous

this journal is very slow and slow to review, sometimesIt will be dragged to 2 years, it is not too easy, and everyone should consider it when they select.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted for a month and a half, still with the editor state, anxious to get angry.At the time of submission for six months, the review began, and there was no news.The decision in process began at the time of submission for 8 months.When I submitted the manuscript for 10 months, I told me that the article was rejected. The main reason is that my article mainly focuses on analysis, and it is far from the environment and earth science.It doesn't matter if you are rejected, this journal is too draggable.I suggest you select for it. If there are more articles and don't worry, then consider this.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1. The review speed is really slow, from the time of submission to receiving 14 months; if anxious friends, it is recommended to remind me often, the editorial attitude is not bad.2. The language requirements are relatively high, it is recommended to find English and American scholars language retouching.3. The review request is general, not strict, but not loose.4. Sign the copyright transfer. If there is no color map, no plate fee will be charged.

(0) Thank | Anonymous