ELECTRONICS LETTERS

Is there a way to track the status of the paper and know whether it’s with the journal editor or out with reviewers?

(0) Thank | vijaykumar.kpd@gmail.com

Because one of the articles does not summarize what experience.The biggest possibility is that luck is better.

(1) Thank | 信仰faith

I think it might be luck to be upstairs.

(0) Thank | 信仰faith

My master, has submited 2019 iscas one, electronics letter, Analog integrated circuits and signal processingI want to solve the following problems:(1) The novelty of the circuit should be sufficient, and it is not possible to repeat things that others have already done many times.This is a big taboo.(2) There must be one or two innovations in the article. There can be no more, because you have no place to write, and you can't have less, otherwise the weight is not enough.Teachers who can't edit, edit, and review are not stupid.(3) The most critical point!English.It's dangerous for your English to be slightly off, not to mention that people write a lot of grammatical errors.(4) Luck.Your bad luck is also a problem.But this is not the point.

(1) Thank | ximing

Submitted for one month, not for accept, then changed to a second district IEEE Trans hit

(7) Thank | sohu

The buddies upstairs, cheering together, this journal is completely looking at luck, the article really does not matter.

(0) Thank | lucky

selectd for four articles, three articles were rejected, all of which were given in one month or so, and one was in trial for 50 days. I hope I can get one

(3) Thank | SCI

100 Floor friends, can you ask when you submitted the manuscript, how long is the result?

(0) Thank | 千里逢迎

This journal has submited in four articles, two of which are in the same place. Personal feelings are very focused on the innovation of the method. At the same time, it is necessary to succinctly explain their own innovations, because this journal has no review opinions.Therefore, before the select must check the regular grammar spelling and other conventional problems

(5) Thank | Anonymous

12月5号, January 12th.It took a lot of time to write Introduction. The first article was written by SCI for a long time.

(4) Thank | BugTan

There are only two review results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

There are only two review results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

for only two results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.

(1) Thank | 462645486@qq.com

The journal has a quick review and a simple process, but it is extremely innovative.Novel idea will receive attention.

(2) Thank | xkd

is very pitted, carefully written, and after being rejected, it was changed to sp.The article looks new, not rigorous enough to try.

(2) Thank | 飒飒

Image processing direction, refused to engage after one and a half months.Your paper has now been reviewed and I am afraid that the decision has been not to publish it in Electronics Letters.Our referees are asked to make a judgement based on whether the activity of the paper would benefit the profession.There is no review opinion.

(0) Thank | fasfdsf

A lot of people say journal garbage, look at what you are, I think even two pages should be carefully written, I wroteSlow, wrote for a month, drawing the most effortTaken a lot of literature, select the appropriate means of expression, the article seeks to clear, about two innovations, but do not cut the crap, seek truth from facts, reviewers are not fools.

(3) Thank | 184891337@qq.com

junk journal. I saw luck and got a good reviewer. I can basically accept it. The quality of the article is not very good.attention.By submitting the journal, it depends on your character.

(6) Thank | computation

This journal is entirely based on luck, the quality of the article does not matter.

(2) Thank | yibeiqingshui

last year after the first select 26 days after being rejected directly, no review comments;Submitted on April 28 this year, accepted directly after 17 days, and there is no review opinion.What I am doing is the electromagnetic direction, it is a hot spot, so it is very fast every time.The first SCI, you have to work harder later!

(3) Thank | 电磁学

to the journal to review a draft, request to return comments within 14 days. Speculate the journal reviewThe manuscript is very fast, and the editorial requirements are high. The thesis must be short and lean, and there is no flaw. If the reviewer finds something that is not perfect, it should be rejected. The journal has only two options: accept, refuse

(0) Thank | huo123

submitted the antenna, three months or still in the trial

(5) Thank | 11

3 Submitted on March 3, directly accepted on May 4.Regardless of whether they accept or reject the draft, there is no review opinion.It is said that the time for the reviewer to review the manuscript is one month, plus the time before and after, if the reviewer finds it smoothly, the result is more common in 2 months.The article must be within 2 pages, the typesetting is very strict, and the individual feels that the quality of the article is: there is a certain innovation, there is no BUG in the work, and it is done in one go.Submissions for articles with small innovation points.

(3) Thank | AC

3 Submitted on March 3, directly accepted on May 4.Regardless of whether they accept or reject the draft, there is no review opinion.It is said that the time for the reviewer to review the manuscript is one month, plus the time before and after, if the reviewer finds it smoothly, the result is more common in 2 months.The article must be within 2 pages, the typesetting is very strict, and the individual feels that the quality of the article is: there is a certain innovation, there is no BUG in the work, and it is done in one go.Submissions for articles with small innovation points.

(0) Thank | ArinCheng

contributed two articles, one was directly acceptd in 38 days, and the other was directly employed in 37 days. In general, it was faster. Generally, there was an idea and a journal would be written soon.

(1) Thank | ppppp