X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ELECTRONICS LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[ELECTRONICS LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 119909 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleELECTRONICS LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsELECTRON LETT
ISSN0013-5194
E-ISSN1350-911X
h-index137
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.300.4540.896
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q2236 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.ietdl.org/EL
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/iet/ell
Open AccessNo
PublisherINST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET, MICHAEL FARADAY HOUSE SIX HILLS WAY STEVENAGE, HERTFORD, ENGLAND, SG1 2AY
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1965
Annual Article Volume584
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0013-5194%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ELECTRONICS LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on ELECTRONICS LETTERS: Write a review
Author: vijaykumar.kpd@gmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 08:16:03
Is there a way to track the status of the paper and know whether it’s with the journal editor or out with reviewers?

(0) Thank | vijaykumar.kpd@gmail.com

Author: 信仰faith


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-22 20:12:19
Because one of the articles does not summarize what experience.The biggest possibility is that luck is better.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 信仰faith

Author: 信仰faith


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-22 20:11:14
I think it might be luck to be upstairs.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 信仰faith

Author: ximing


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-19 03:49:30
My master, has submited 2019 iscas one, electronics letter, Analog integrated circuits and signal processingI want to solve the following problems:(1) The novelty of the circuit should be sufficient, and it is not possible to repeat things that others have already done many times.This is a big taboo.(2) There must be one or two innovations in the article. There can be no more, because you have no place to write, and you can't have less, otherwise the weight is not enough.Teachers who can't edit, edit, and review are not stupid.(3) The most critical point!English.It's dangerous for your English to be slightly off, not to mention that people write a lot of grammatical errors.(4) Luck.Your bad luck is also a problem.But this is not the point.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ximing

Author: sohu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-26 23:28:08
Submitted for one month, not for accept, then changed to a second district IEEE Trans hit
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | sohu

Author: lucky


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-05 13:05:43
The buddies upstairs, cheering together, this journal is completely looking at luck, the article really does not matter.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lucky

Author: SCI


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-28 21:52:51
selectd for four articles, three articles were rejected, all of which were given in one month or so, and one was in trial for 50 days. I hope I can get one
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | SCI

Author: 千里逢迎


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-31 15:11:56
100 Floor friends, can you ask when you submitted the manuscript, how long is the result?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 千里逢迎

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 16:30:11
This journal has submited in four articles, two of which are in the same place. Personal feelings are very focused on the innovation of the method. At the same time, it is necessary to succinctly explain their own innovations, because this journal has no review opinions.Therefore, before the select must check the regular grammar spelling and other conventional problems
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: BugTan


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-12 18:26:18
12月5号, January 12th.It took a lot of time to write Introduction. The first article was written by SCI for a long time.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | BugTan

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-20 08:26:46
There are only two review results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-20 08:26:43
There are only two review results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 462645486@qq.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-20 08:25:11
for only two results: accept or reject.Personally feel that the journal has a high demand for innovation in the article.I was also the first to select for the journal, so I was very cautious before I selectd, and even found a native American to help me modify it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 462645486@qq.com

Author: xkd


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-20 12:26:22
The journal has a quick review and a simple process, but it is extremely innovative.Novel idea will receive attention.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xkd

Author: 飒飒


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-04 16:23:25
is very pitted, carefully written, and after being rejected, it was changed to sp.The article looks new, not rigorous enough to try.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 飒飒

Author: fasfdsf


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-13 10:33:46
Image processing direction, refused to engage after one and a half months.Your paper has now been reviewed and I am afraid that the decision has been not to publish it in Electronics Letters.Our referees are asked to make a judgement based on whether the activity of the paper would benefit the profession.There is no review opinion.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fasfdsf

Author: 184891337@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-09 22:23:30
A lot of people say journal garbage, look at what you are, I think even two pages should be carefully written, I wroteSlow, wrote for a month, drawing the most effortTaken a lot of literature, select the appropriate means of expression, the article seeks to clear, about two innovations, but do not cut the crap, seek truth from facts, reviewers are not fools.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 184891337@qq.com

Author: computation


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-14 14:08:23
junk journal. I saw luck and got a good reviewer. I can basically accept it. The quality of the article is not very good.attention.By submitting the journal, it depends on your character.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | computation

Author: yibeiqingshui


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-13 10:32:59
This journal is entirely based on luck, the quality of the article does not matter.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yibeiqingshui

Author: 电磁学


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-15 18:55:38
last year after the first select 26 days after being rejected directly, no review comments;Submitted on April 28 this year, accepted directly after 17 days, and there is no review opinion.What I am doing is the electromagnetic direction, it is a hot spot, so it is very fast every time.The first SCI, you have to work harder later!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 电磁学

Author: huo123


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-08 12:00:49
to the journal to review a draft, request to return comments within 14 days. Speculate the journal reviewThe manuscript is very fast, and the editorial requirements are high. The thesis must be short and lean, and there is no flaw. If the reviewer finds something that is not perfect, it should be rejected. The journal has only two options: accept, refuse
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | huo123

Author: 11


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-23 09:47:57
submitted the antenna, three months or still in the trial
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 11

Author: AC


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-18 23:46:15
3 Submitted on March 3, directly accepted on May 4.Regardless of whether they accept or reject the draft, there is no review opinion.It is said that the time for the reviewer to review the manuscript is one month, plus the time before and after, if the reviewer finds it smoothly, the result is more common in 2 months.The article must be within 2 pages, the typesetting is very strict, and the individual feels that the quality of the article is: there is a certain innovation, there is no BUG in the work, and it is done in one go.Submissions for articles with small innovation points.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | AC

Author: ArinCheng


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-18 23:45:38
3 Submitted on March 3, directly accepted on May 4.Regardless of whether they accept or reject the draft, there is no review opinion.It is said that the time for the reviewer to review the manuscript is one month, plus the time before and after, if the reviewer finds it smoothly, the result is more common in 2 months.The article must be within 2 pages, the typesetting is very strict, and the individual feels that the quality of the article is: there is a certain innovation, there is no BUG in the work, and it is done in one go.Submissions for articles with small innovation points.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ArinCheng

Author: ppppp


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-03 01:28:08
contributed two articles, one was directly acceptd in 38 days, and the other was directly employed in 37 days. In general, it was faster. Generally, there was an idea and a journal would be written soon.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ppppp

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [ELECTRONICS LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service