Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | CRYSTENGCOMM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | CRYSTENGCOMM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1466-8033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 9.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ce | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/ReSourCe/index.cfm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Chemistry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 817 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1466-8033%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on CRYSTENGCOMM: | Write a review |
Author: jszb1324 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-18 16:27:17 Overall, CEC was very quick in terms of the review process, which was great. Our manuscript was accepted in less than a month, and the editor was very professional. My one negative comment is that the reviewers were somewhat unreasonable in their edits and comments (which was recognized by the editor). ![]() ![]() |
Author: 流恋糖 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-26 11:01:55 Half-month review comments came back overhaul, minor repairs in half a month, and accepted after 4 days.The first paper, excited ![]() ![]() |
Author: sunlight Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-07 11:30:18 The article was edited, and a report came out after the submission. The journal's recruitment rate is less than 40%.I submitted it in early November, the article ID number is 1900, and less than 1000 articles are accepted each year, and the data is reliable.I pray that the editor can submit my article for review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 魏悄悄 Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-26 12:57:03 Submitted on July 20th, review comments on August 15th, both reviewers are overhauled, supplemented with experimental data, repaired on September 5threturn.Received on September 26.High efficiency~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-08-26 09:54:22 Submitted to receive for almost a month, the efficiency is really high, I hope the journal is getting better and better, the impact factor is getting higher and higher ![]() ![]() |
Author: yjf Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-14 19:54:30 2018.6.05 Submitted for review one week later, 6.27 overhaul, 7.05 minor repair, 7.13 reception, about 40 days, speed is still possible ![]() ![]() |
Author: yjf Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-14 19:54:25 2018.6.05 submitted for review a week later, 6.27 overhaul, 7.05 minor repair, 7.13 reception, about 40 days, speed is still possible ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1136946432@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-15 14:14:25 2018,3,01-submitted-submitted2018, 4, 03-major revision (three reviewers have a total of 11 opinions, one rejects the manuscript, a major repair, a minor repair. The editor makes the overhaul.)2017,4,30- a revision Has been submitted2018,5,15-accept. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 123456 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-30 16:46:39 Not yet letter ![]() ![]() |
Author: jyxiayan@whu.edu.cn Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-04 01:13:18 08-Jan-2018 Submitted (send it from the editor after about 5 days);20-Jan-2018 Major Revision (there are 5 comments from two reviewers, and there are about 3 additional trials! It is helpful to improve the quality of your thesis.)03-Feb-2018 A revision has been submitted (it is expected to return to the hands of 2 reviewers, one agrees to accept, one has some minor problems);24-Feb-2018 Minor Revision (may be delayed due to the Spring Festival, but it is still very fast!)01-Mar-2018 A revision Has been submitted03-Mar-2018 Accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: zzzaa Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-02-18 14:49:35 2017,11,02 one shot-submitted2017,11,27-Reject and Resubmitted2017,12,13-Resubmitted2018,1,22-Major revision2018,1,25-Revision submitted and accept.The total time is close to 3 months, and the individual feels that giving a re-review and re-submitment is a great opportunity to make serious changes. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 浅念对白 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-02 20:37:21 2017.06.24 selectd DALTON TRANSACTIONS, 2017.06.27 received an editorial rejection and strongly recommended to switch to CRYSTENGCOMM, because the article itself is to study nano-single crystals and crystal clusters, indeed as the editor said is more suitableCrystal Communications Magazine.2017.07.17 received the overhaul notice, the two reviewers respectively raised 6 questions, all of which were better to answer, added a decimal and returned to the editor after 07.20, and then were sent to one of the reviewers.2017.07.25 accept2017.08.06 proof2017.09.01 See publicationAfter switching to receiving less than a month, I still recommend that you select for the journal, which saves time and effort.Of course, do not rule out good luck published in a better journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: dandan Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-14 09:14:29 2017-2-26Draft, 4-9 days to come back to review comments, refused to re-submit, three reviewers, a more positive work, minor repair; a major repair; editor sent to arbitrationArbitration overhaul; after careful modification, 5-12 re-submitment, 6-13 days to receive.According to the editors and reviewers' comments, careful and careful revision will have good results.I wish you all the best, and the manuscripts that have been submitted have good results. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 天狼星 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-11 19:41:22 has been selectd for 10 days, submitted on June 2nd, and became editor with June 3rd, then there is no more....I have been in the With editor state, I don’t know what the situation is. I selectd for Communication ah ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1360870444@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-20 12:32:51 3.26Submission 5.03 Minor repair 5. 12th return 5.19 reception ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1150885049@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-04-15 19:00:19 2月25Submission, March 17 return, two minor repairs, March 29 modified return, April 13 accept online ![]() ![]() |
Author: jyrensdu@sina.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-04-02 09:20:32 2 submission on the 12th, March 31st to first-instance opinion, separated by 48 days, twoReviewers, all given minor repairs;After dragging on for so long, I thought that I was arbitrated. The final result is still good. It may be because of the reason for the New Year. Editor-selected Academician Zhang Hongjie~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: jiangaj1616 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-01-13 21:01:20 article. It is quite fast, nanomaterials.Direction, the first shot Crystengcomm, 2015.11.13 select, 2015.12.07 overhaul, 2016.0-1.07 return revised draft, 2016.01.13 directly accepted.Zhang edits quite quickly! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-18 20:40:00 The time for editors to reviewers is relatively short, general communication for 1 week, full text and review for 2 weeks. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-18 11:38:00 first selectd for the journal, a Full Paper was submitted to the journal from October 10th, and there is no first-instance news yet. After listening to the insects, the journal is now reviewing the paper very slowly.I want to know how long the review period for the journal editor is for the reviewer.On November 27th, the results of the first trial, the two reviewers, a lot of criticisms on the review comments, made many suggestions on the sentences in the paper, another evaluation actively recommended the publication, the editor found the editorial board arbitration, the arbitration took the bugThe papers were incomplete, and actually said that under such inaccurate theory, there are still so many "ridiculous" data reported, and the rejection of the manuscript, the words feel very disrespectful to the author, it is doubtful that the judges morality. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-18 08:49:00 has a small job, submitted Crystal Growth & Design rejected, changed to CrystEngComm, selectd on the 15th, there is no news yet, I hope to give a force, at least send a review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-03 10:10:00 This posting speed is really good!Three review comments in two weeks!Minor repair, upload the night to accept!Complete all the programs in less than a month!Zhang editor is very efficient!The quality of this article is really good, I feel a good article reviewer, the editor's attitude is really good!I hope everyone has to help!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-21 20:26:00 30-Aug contribution; 30-Sep revision comments returned, two reviewers, one minor repair one refused to engage, the editor gave an arbitration, arbitration minor repair, and finally edited to Xiao Xiu; 16-Oct Edited the manuscript, was scared to death, submitted a revised draft on the 17th; 21-Oct editorial notice accepted!From submission to recruitment for almost 2 months, I had some delays in the middle, and the editors and reviewers were very friendly and made some constructive comments... ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-04 12:29:00 The first submitment in Asian chemistry and pccp were not submitted for review, and the journal did not report great hopes. The submission was submitted on July 29, minor repair on September 19, and received on October 3!!!!!It’s quite smooth, it’s been a little longer.....Pray for the National Award!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-30 20:34:00 27-Aug-2013Submission.13-Sep-2013 Review comments returned.Two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair.20-Sep-2013 revised draft is sent back.It is accepted 10 days later (today 30-Sep-2013).From submission to recruitment for 1 month and 3 days. High efficiency.Reviewers and editors are very friendly. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last (To Page |