X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 17215 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsCRIT REV BIOTECHNOL
ISSN0738-8551
E-ISSN1549-7801
h-index79
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.701.7032.324
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Immunology and Microbiology
Subcategory: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Q14 / 105
Category: Immunology and Microbiology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q114 / 275

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)1.40%
Official Websitehttp://informahealthcare.com/loi/bty
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bbtn
Open AccessNo
PublisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started1983
Annual Article Volume65
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0738-8551%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: Invited contributions ? Irregular
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Ordinary
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: L2C


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-10-20 22:15:25
The review paper was written with my supervisor, which took a lot of hard work and was reviewed three times after submission, and it took a total year to get published. It may because that the field is too small (microbial fuel cell), so looking for reviewers for the first review took a long time (3 months). A dozen review comments from one reviewer returned, and at the same time, the editor asked me to polish the paper. The manuscript was returned one month later after completing the revisions as required. After another 3 months for the second review, 30 comments were returned. We revised and returned it exhaustedly. The third review lasted another three months, returned a dozen opinions. We rushed responding it and returned the revision. Then follows the acceptance, proofreading and publishing. Looking back, as a beginner in scientific research, I suffered a lot in terms of language and writing context. At the same time, finding reviewers is also very important. It is recommended that contributors in subdivisions can appropriately recommend domain experts as reviewers); The advantage of the article is that the discussion was more detailed, and the figures were carefully made and are exquisite, which should be a bonus. These were not required to be adjusted, and ultimately supported my publication. It took a year and I was really tired, and the IF dropped from 7.5 to 7. It might be stabilized around this value in the future.

(6) Thank | L2C

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-19 03:42:00
The review period for Critical Reviews in BioTechnology is too long – around a half a year. I’ll submit to this journal again if they shorten the review cycle.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-04 23:45:00
Editor is responsible, as long as the reviewer is found, the speed is stopped, my copy is accepted from the select for one month, the impact factor in 2011 is 6.5, I hope this year will exceed7
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-11 19:44:00
has already selectd 4Month, returning a reviewer's opinion in the middle, and mentioning 26 suggestions. The editor-in-chief requested to modify and then select again. Now I am in the second instance. I don't know how much the acceptance rate is. I hope I can
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-04 18:26:00
recently submittedAfter one article, I am reviewing, I don’t know how difficult it is?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-19 01:56:00
2011 IF=5.287 reviewed an article, the specific difficulty is unknown
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service