Chinese Physics B

Feb 7, submission; Feb 8, the editor finished the review and sent it to an expert; Feb 15, it was sent to 2 reviewers; Feb 25, one expert sent back the result (it was estimated on March 2); Mar 9, a review expert was changed; Mar 19, I urged the review; Mar 20, one expert sent back the result (it was estimated on Mar 9). It was rejected and the other reviewer was cancelled (it was estimated on Apr 3). The comments given: One reviewer said that the research was meaningful but not compatible with physics, and it was recommended to transfer to engineering-related journals; The other said there were some formatting issues, and finally, the editor rejected the article. The response for reminder was quick, and I appeal for withdrawing the article, but received no reply. However, being delayed for one and a half months is better than being delayed four months. I transferred it to another journal.

(0) Thank | sean

I’m afraid I may be the worst tragedy here. It’s almost three months since the initial review, and only one reviewer finished the review within three weeks. Thank him, and the two others who refused to review on the same day were also very user-friendly. There were three noble reviewers refused to review within more than half a month to thirty-five days. The editor is still finding reviewers for me. So responsible. Thank you very much. Graduation by this is definitely hopeless. I just hope that some reviewers or potential reviewers who see this message can reject it immediately when receiving an invitation for review. Do not delay for more than a month and then refuse the review. Is there any timeliness of a scientific research after wasting a month and another month? It really hurts. Those who want to submit should also be careful. If you research into something that is not popular in China, it is best not to submit to this journal. They cannot invite any reviewers. Finally, the result of this manuscript is not important anymore, and I will never submit to journals in China later.

(6) Thank | luobotoudaily

The first time I submitted my paper, most of the review comments, given in 3 weeks, were quite positive, however, I had a different opinion than the reviewer on one thing. I felt that my article was more innovative than he said. Moreover, if I changed it according to his suggestions, my article would have to be basically rewritten, so I told him that.  It took another 40 days or so, but I did change everything according to his comments and then resubmitted. At first, there was only one reviewer. I felt that after 10 days of review by one reviewer, my manuscript should have been approved. However, on the day of the review, the editor found two reviewers and they examined it for another month. They asked for all minor revisions. I spent three days modifying the paper and then resubmitted. The next day, I received an acceptance. In summary: 1. Don't compete with the reviewer and honestly follow his advice, unless you are a top researcher or his opinion is completely wrong. 2. CPB's review is really fast; I would recommend any researcher to submit there. The editor is very responsible, very good.

(7) Thank | wangxiangda1990@163.com

Unable to control your anxiety, what to do.Fear of being rejected again, it is really hopeless to graduate.I have not accepted two of the two articles, and it’s too shameful to have a master’s degree.How do you overcome this mentality, and now you are particularly anxious.

(0) Thank | luobotoudaily

It’s not been long before I selectd. I’m so happy that I hope that I’m going well, I’m in the English version, and I’ll come back with feedback.I look forward to it and hope that everyone will go well.

(0) Thank | luobotoudaily

The review speed is very fast, 2.27 days of submission, 3.09 returned to the review comments, the opinions are very pertinent and detailed, one raised 6 questions, one raised 10 questions, it can be seenVery familiar with the field.A reply of more than ten pages was submitted after about one month of revision.The second trial was about one month, the acceptance notice was received on 5.14, and the publish online in August. Today is 09.18. The web of science has been searched and the whole process is still very fast.In addition, because of the format, date of publication, etc., and editing emails and telephone conversations throughout the process, I feel that the editors are very good, and the information recovery speed is super fast. Under the guarantee of fairness, we can understand the anxiety of the doctors.

(3) Thank | 钢牙小韩

Reviewing speed is fast, reviewing carefully and carefully, comments in the middle

(0) Thank | qq305912482

After the submission, minor repairs are directly acceptd.The editor is responsible for helping with the grammatical modification, and the attitude is very good

(0) Thank | pgw

, submitted on September 28, 2017.Rejected on October 17, and submitted a revised draft on November 3rd after the appeal.After reviewing the manuscript on November 19th, the editor did not make a decision, but instead sought a second reviewer.Three people were found to refuse trials in succession, and each time they dragged on for about two weeks.It was not until January 13 that there was a second review opinion.The result was repaired.Submit the return draft on January 31.Admitted on March 7.Too tired, tossing for half a year.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is really fast. There is a reviewer who refused to review for two weeks. The first trial was only one month. After the revision, the two reviewers quickly passed, and the editor-in-chief finally approved one.Month is a bit slow

(5) Thank | 北邮某只

submitted an optical one. From the submission to the reception for more than 2 months, the teachers of the editorial department have a good attitude and strong sense of responsibility.Very supportive domestic physics SCI journal.

(1) Thank | TJW

first trial is very slow, six months, hope the result is good.

(0) Thank | ilovekeyan

paper mainIt is to correct the model of magneto-mechanical effect under the weak magnetic field condition based on JA theory. The review speed is very fast, from submission to the confirmation of the employment experience for 4 and a half months, two reviewers, one English one Chinese opinion

(0) Thank | 402585133@qq.com

The first trial is usually 1 month, and the holiday may be delayed.2 reviewers (Chinese comments), for the opinions to be revised one by one, and some comments that are deemed unnecessary or impossible to modify give reasonable explanations.From submission to publication for about half a year, the efficiency is not bad, and the editor is very serious and responsible.just...The journal quotes a lot of articles from the Journal of Physics and CPB...

(2) Thank | 硅先森

has been submitted for two months, and there is no result in the under peer review.Do you still have such a slow situation?

(0) Thank | 小裤裤

is too slow!In May, the manuscript was submitted, and the results were published in the first half of the first month. After the overhaul, the reply was quickly made, and the change was made. However, the total compilation was carried out for one month, so it was accepted in August.Who wants to ask for a quick release in time, and only edited the comments in English in November, and has not been here since.According to the online publication, it is impossible before January 2014.At least 9 months, far worse than foreign journals, regret not to submit in the country, not formal.I have been in physics for a year and know that I have to take care of a person and can publish it in the second month.Chinese characteristics.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first trial was reviewed in one month, and it was repaired two weeks later, accepting one week later.The editor is very responsible and the review is faster.I don't know if it will be published in a few months?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted an article, the main content is to study a differential equation that often appears in physics articles, and comprehensively analyze its mathematical properties. Originally, confidence is sufficient. I did not expect to review the draft conclusion.There is no physical background!!!!!!It may be a big idea. I feel that the references are all physical. I can't say that there is no physical background. It will be recovered after half a semester.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

was rejected once, re-submitted after modification, and finally received ~~ how to say?It’s hard to be new and too innovative.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Started from 2013.1.1, received at 2013.8.5, after four revisions, two reviewers, editor-in-chief revised comments, and finally received.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The rejection rate of this journal is quite low. My paper has been rejected. Is it a little sad reminder!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Why can't the Chinese physics b homepage template link be downloaded, who can upload it? Thank you,

(0) Thank | Anonymous

4月17日投出,外审专家A Chinese person and a foreigner (according to the revised opinion, one Chinese and one English speculated, may not be allowed) gave a review opinion on May 6th, and the paper was highly evaluated, and some amendments were briefly proposed.After the revision was completed and submitted to the chief editor for final review, the chief editor gave the final review opinion on June 14th, or minor repairs.The last July 1st received a letter of acceptance.Personally think that the cpb recruitment rate and speed is still good!The process is as follows: Editor Preliminary ReviewEditor 2013-04-16 2013-05-01 2013-04-17

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I would like to ask the master, what journals need articles on laser transmission, so as to avoid delays in submission, thank you!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

two reviewers, the speed of editing and processing the article is super fast, that is, the editor-in-chief has been dragged for one month.

(0) Thank | Anonymous