X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CHEMOSPHERE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[CHEMOSPHERE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 202991 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMOSPHERE
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEMOSPHERE
ISSN0045-6535
h-index212
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.801.5301.635
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q18 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q112 / 120
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q115 / 115
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q115 / 128
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q141 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/362/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/CHEMOSPHERE
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1972
Annual Article Volume2371
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0045-6535%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.9 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 72%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMOSPHERE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on CHEMOSPHERE: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 10:58:00
July 10, 2013 Contributions August 20th overhaul August 29th repairGoing back to September 25th to accept this submission is relatively fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-03 11:10:00
just submitted an article about heavy metal adsorption, was rejected at the editor, because it is not suitable for the scope of this journal.Let's change your character.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 11:07:00
Tangle, what is going on???My article 2013-4-1 contributed, 2013-4-6 edited and returned once, 2013-4-11 returned for unknown reasons, 2013-6-2 confirmed the Technical Check In Progress status, 2013-6-6 under review, 2013-7-10 The editor returned to the overhaul, but there was no reviewer's opinion. The editor requested to re-send the information of the six reviewers after the revision. What is going on???Has anyone encountered this situation???
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-10 21:20:00
This journal is too slow. I selectd in August 12th, after a major overhaul, three minor repairs, the second and third times are the same decision letter and comments, actuallyY's editor was mistaken, and it delayed me for a whole month and a half. I finally accepted it today, and I don't select for this journal anymore, too slow!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-02 12:45:00
A process that I recently received: 06 Dec 2012 submitted07 Dec 2012 Editor Invited10 Dec 2012 Tcchnical Check In Progess11 Dec 2012 Editor Assigned08 Jan 2013 Reviewer Invited09 Jan 2013 Under Review18 Jan 2013 Under Review23 Ja
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-25 16:09:00
contributed in December last year, between reviewers invited and under reviewChange, I thought I wanted tolong time.The result was finally stabilized in the under review in January of this year. In February, the moderation revision was notified. The review comments only had some language and details. After the revision was submitted, the editor directly decided to accept.Before this article was rejected, I made a detailed revision based on the est review comments before the chem. It should be helpful to improve the level of the article, but it also shows that chem is not a small gap compared with est.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 15:40:00
Submitted to the overhaul after half a year, the review time is not too short. Submit the revised draft after 1 month and accept it one week later.What is done is the theoretical calculation of environmental pollutants. The theory of quantitative journals is not deep enough. There is no experimental data for submiting in pure environmental categories. However, this cross-over research is a good choice for chemosphere. After all, the journals accept a large range of articles and influence factors.And word of mouth are not bad
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-24 15:39:00
5 at the end of the month, the results of the technical review, however, please modify the company's revised June 4 re-submitment, and then one month in the reviewer (s) invited, send an email to ask the editorAfter that, the status is finally changed to under review.I was very convinced that I would give a reviewer very quickly. Who knows that the reviewer who was originally invited has not given the review comments, and the state of the middle has changed a few times, and it has been in the reviewer(s) invited and underSwing between reviews.After about 4 months, I simply refused to submit the manuscript. Under the online inquiry, I learned that the editorial department had invited more than 10 reviewers before and after. It was really sad reminder.Fortunately, just half a year later, the review comments came back.Review
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-17 19:59:00
Two reviewers, one agreed, one suggested overhaul, was forced to go to Northernization to do ESR supplement data before accepting.The editor is very responsible and has strict requirements on data and format.If a punctuation is missed, it must be played back and changed again.In general, Chemosphere is still a very good journal. It is also highly recognized in the environmental world. IF is rising steadily. Unlike JHM, BT is flooded.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-20 16:49:00
After three months, through modification, the modification is submitted for about 10 days to accept!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-19 12:21:00
1Invested an article in the month, reviewing the manuscript for 2 months, one overhaul, one rejecting the manuscript (the reviewer did not understand the article at all), so appealed it according to the review opinion, and the editor later made the change.After the re-submitment, it took a month to modify, submitted, a long review (3 months), then overhaul (1 month), minor repair, and finally accepted this month.The whole process took 9 months and it was really long.The efficiency of chem editing is sometimes very low, sometimes very fast, and people are lucky.Feeling chem is still relatively difficult to select, although the factor is not high.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-15 20:34:00
Time is indeed a bit long; submitted on March 11th, undergoing overhaul, minor repair, only received on September 14.Nima got it for half a year and couldn’t afford it!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-04 17:34:00
2012,03.24 Submission 2012.05.19 under review 2012.07.01 Zhong Xiu 2012.07.16 upload revised manuscript 2012.07.21 accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-04 13:45:00
is speechless, submission is still fast fiveMonths, still under review, are mad, and have been urged once in the middle, still the speed of this turtle, I do not know what to do!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-25 16:06:00
selectd for 5 months, under review 2 times, invited reviewers four times, and currently invited reviewers.Such journals will be less submited in the future, affecting graduation and not affecting the mood and endangering life!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-23 15:36:00
lasted 3 and a half months and finally accepted!7-18 submitted to journal7-19 with editor; editor invited;7-23 technical check in progress7-25 Editor Assigned8-3 reviewer invited8-5 under review10-25 Decision in Process10-26 Minor revision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-19 09:57:00
The journal editor is very efficient. I selectd for the journal for the first time. I submitted a manuscript for the shadow of the modified format and immediately refused to submit it. This wastes a lot of time. Of course, I may not be able to do my homework in the early stage.Personally feel that the innovation of the paper or its own characteristics is very important.I submitted the manuscript in April, over 20 major overhaul in May, more than 40 comments, two reviewers, of course, many small problems are not enough for my own format modification, there are several big problems, each question is answeringThe time is half-page text, plus the literature, personally think that the attitude of revision is very important, each must be carefully and carefully answered and revised, even if the reviewer does not look carefully, but also said that he did not express clearly.After that, from the format to the content, the N change was reviewed. In early July, the feedback was returned to the editorial department. Originally, it was rejected by
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-18 21:36:00
for one week and was not submitted for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-30 14:24:00
One and a half months before the notification is rejected, the speed is a bit slow!!Just rejected, tangled!!!Reason I therefore consider your manuscript not suitable for our journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-31 08:53:00
The draft of the submitment in August 2011 has been assigned to the editor, and was reviewed under the end of March 2012, and the review comments were revised in mid-April.Go back and always assign to the editor, only one and a half months later.More than 9 months, slow to die, if you are eager to graduate, try to select as little as possible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-26 10:59:00
An article submitted in mid-August last year, finally accepted a few days ago.The speed is very slow now, I don't know why.The trial of the first draft took about five and a half months, and the second was urged twice.All of them received a comment from the reviewer and then contacted another reviewer to reply..I came back to Zhongxiu’s opinion at the beginning of February this year, after I was repaired in early April.Not sent to the external trial, accepted one and a half months later.I was anxious to graduate, and I was urged twice in the middle. After the second reminder, I accepted it three days later.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-21 19:32:00
selectd for two and a half months, changed to Reviewer(s) invited more than one month, and then turned into Reviewer(s) invited for more than a month, completely speechless, because I was tooAdmire.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 17:38:00
The experience of tragedy, it seems that a reviewer N Jiumu had a reply before, and then changed one again, so the review results have been waiting for a long time. My paper is about adsorption,But it is not a traditional adsorption study. When I encounter a speechless reviewer, I completely misread the focus of the paper. But now it is not easy to send an article related to adsorption, because as a classic research direction, everyone is doing very well now.Fine, the process of the experiment is very careful. Another classmate has a similar experience, lamenting that chemo is very unfriendly to the adsorption, 唉~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-10 13:49:00
3 filed on the 18th, changed the format (toAdd the line number), resubmitted a recommended reviewer, submitted it again on the 30th, sent it to the trial on April 6th, and returned on May 10th, was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-09 18:26:00
An article written by Shijie before.After graduation, I left.The boss asked me to change the format according to the chemosphere and submitted it out at the end of March.(I am two).I just received the rejected message today.Previously, the sister has already published an article on it.Previously, it was mainly submitted est, or WR.At the time of the revision, I was somewhat confident, and now I was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [CHEMOSPHERE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service