X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ChemCatChem

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[ChemCatChem]Hello, you are Visitor Number 88036 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleChemCatChem
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEMCATCHEM
ISSN1867-3880
E-ISSN1867-3899
h-index86
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.401.3380.923
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Organic Chemistry
Q122 / 183
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Q123 / 162
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Catalysis
Q219 / 57
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Inorganic Chemistry
Q17 / 69

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.20%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1867-3899
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/CCTC
Open AccessNo
PublisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH, PO BOX 10 11 61, WEINHEIM, GERMANY, D-69451
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume686
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1867-3880%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ChemCatChem】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on ChemCatChem: Write a review
Author: 冰岛的微笑


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-04 13:53:52
The article was submitted on October 17, 2019. It was sent for review the next day, and then it had always been "under review". We waited it for so long until before Christmas, and I wrote a reminder letter to ask about the it. The editor replied that no suitable reviewer was found, and said that they would find a reviewer as soon as possible, and asked us to wait patiently. After that, I received the revision comments on January 14. Both reviewers required minor revisions, and the review comments were very pertinent. It was revised and returned within two weeks and then got accepted the next day. I'm really happy. Good things are a long time in coming. It was an eventful spring in 2020, and finally there was some good news. Hope you all have good luck~

(7) Thank | 冰岛的微笑

Author: 烯仔仔


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-04 16:14:07
The review was extremely fast, but it was not accepted, it is the reason that the manuscript was really not so good. It took 16 days in total. 20191009, submitted to journal; the same day, with editor; 20191011, under review; 20191025, rejected. The second reviewer was a bit fierce, and rejection comments were quite ruthless. I still blame myself, and I don't think I’m suitable for scientific research.

(6) Thank | 烯仔仔

Author: chemtwins


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-27 12:55:19
Initial Date Submitted: 21 Feb 2019. Revised: 11 Mar 2019. The editor accepted it directly, but there were still some minor errors. I supplemented the experiments and resubmitted it on March 26, 2019. It was accepted within a day; the accepted version of manuscript was uploaded. The processing speed of this journal is quick, so I recommend you to submit.

(2) Thank | chemtwins

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-06 23:14:00
I submitted an article to ChemCatChem in the middle of last month, and I received an editorial rejection notice this morning. A total of three people reviewed the manuscript, and two of the reviewers felt very new to the field based on their comments. They only had issues with the writing and suggested that the manuscript be accepted. In contrast, the third reviewer said that the writing was fine (only minor revisions). Instead, the third reviewer claimed that the experimental method I used was not novel and that the same method was used back in 1980; they recommended rejection. Thinking of appealing the editor’s decision.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 17388896650@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-07 14:05:12
review cycle is generally one month, but waited for nearly two months, reviewThe manuscript was returned. Fortunately, there was no arbitration. There was only one reviewer and it was a minor repair. It is estimated that the editor is very familiar with my research direction. I don’t want to spend time to continue to search for reviewers. I was finally invited to cover.article.I wish chemcatchem will be better and better, and I hope that the impact factor will return to 5.0 or more next year!
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | 17388896650@qq.com

Author: 1738889650@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-07 13:55:44
submitted ChemCoumn and Advanced Synthesis
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1738889650@qq.com

Author: 顾十一


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-19 14:01:41
Submitted on the 2nd day for review, 1 month for review, two reviewers' opinions, one praise, one middle comment, and the overwriting in the comments.But the editor refused, it is a pity.I don't know how many such phenomena are there?Still my own back.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 顾十一

Author: xiaojiu813@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-17 14:54:03
often search for submissions here and share your experiences.After the article was rejected by the Journal of catalysis, it was changed to chemcatchem. Although it was troublesome to get the template, it was nearly 5 days, and the editing speed was very fast. After submitting the draft, it was submitted for review one week, and after 5 days, it returned to the opinion and received directly, for a total of about ten days.The comments given by the reviewers are very constructive, and they are returned after further revision. I hope that the journal will be better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | xiaojiu813@163.com

Author: 632939566@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-17 23:58:37
often see everyone's sharing here, and also learned a lot of knowledge about submission!I will share my experience.After 3 weeks of submission, I received it directly, but I still gave suggestions for minor repairs!After 2 weeks, the revised manuscript will be returned, and the next day will be checked online!Just a long proof wait!After hanging online for 7 weeks, I haven't received proof yet. There are still about 20 pieces to edit from the official website. Estimated 2 months or so.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 632939566@qq.com

Author: LAA


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-19 20:23:49
8In the middle of the month, I submitted a review for about 25 days, overhauled, the language was repaired, and the experimental data was added. I received it directly in mid-September.Very efficient.That is, many colleges and universities do not have OA, which is a fly in the ointment.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | LAA

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-02 11:09:16
Pretty good, chemcatchem review is pretty fast, not bad, although the recent impact factor has fallen.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: xiao


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-19 14:45:24
is very efficient.No need to choose an editor.10 days after submitting the manuscript, returning to the review comments, both reviewers are minor repairs;After the modification, re-upload and accept it directly after one day;Currently the manuscript is waiting for the Internet.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xiao

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-12 10:14:00
Three people reviewing the manuscript, two editors Xiaoxiu, one requesting the data
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-28 17:54:00
It has been accepted, but the editor has made less in the layout process.Citing two articles from this group, the result gave an opportunity to explain. Because the explanation failed to convince him, it was revoked and depressed. But I really admire the rigor of changing the journal, although I was rejected but happy.Accepted!I will select again now, I hope this will be successful!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-20 14:27:00
2013/6/8 Submission 2013/7/18 Directly accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-21 21:48:00
Published on January 19, 2013; review comments on February 26, 2013, a minor repair, a major repair, edited to the overhaul; March 24, 2013 revised 2013On April 24th, I agreed to receive the revised version of May 2, 2013. June 2, 2013 Notice Proof Sample June 21, 2013 online
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-08 21:53:00
A full paper, sufficient content, detailed research.March 29, 2013 Submission on May 26, 2013, two months is coming, no news, and I was urged to write a letter to remind me.On May 27, 2013, the DOI number was given and received directly.Filled in a data, online July 6, 2013.It takes a total of three months and seven days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-01 15:50:00
See the person aboveThe results are good, one of my articles was submitted on December 27, 2012. It has been two months, and there is no result. Why am I still so slow?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-18 10:49:00
An article about angewThe reviewer is highly important and the other suggests to switch to chemcatchem (important).No way, I switched to chemcatchem and received it directly within a week. It is estimated that there is no review, and the letter edited by angew.I feel that the journal has high requirements for the importance and innovation of the work.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-29 13:20:00
At the end of 2011, a full paper was submitted, and the review comments were received in about 40 days. One reviewer suggested minor repairs, and another reviewer suggested rejection.The editorial suggestion, there are better results and then re-submited, and declined.That was depressed at the time!!Later, I selectd for a journal in the 3rd district for 2 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-06 14:09:00
to submitted an article, 1.5 months to review the comments, a major repair, a small repair and continue to submit for review, directly after three weeks to receive...The request is still quite high, optimistic about this journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-10 16:01:00
There is an article I want to try, which heroes help me recommend an editor...?Thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-28 22:14:00
Three reviewers, one minor repair, one directly rejecting the manuscript, the editor gave the opinions of two people to the third reviewer, which was an overhaul. After the revision, the editor gave the manuscript a rejection.The person who refused to draft, did not seriously read the paper, the question is really pediatrics, no matter what you say, it is rejection.We refuted its opinion, waiting for the editor to process
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-06 16:33:00
submitted for 40 days to receive the review comments, a major repair, a minor repair, received an editorial reply two weeks later, now waiting for proof,The whole process is quite smooth.I hope it is a potential journal like chemsuschem.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-21 17:09:00
This is my third article on ChemCatChem and the longest one, which has been dragged on for five and a half months.The first overhaul, after the revision, a reviewer still did not agree to accept, to be drafted.The editor felt that the reviewers’ opinions were far-fetched and they accepted them directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [ChemCatChem]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service