X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CATALYSIS LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[CATALYSIS LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 69837 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCATALYSIS LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsCATAL LETT
ISSN1011-372X
E-ISSN1572-879X
h-index111
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.100.5670.694
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q2106 / 398
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Catalysis
Q334 / 57

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.40%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/10562
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/catl
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1988
Annual Article Volume330
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1011-372X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CATALYSIS LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on CATALYSIS LETTERS: Write a review
Author: 啊呀切


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-17 15:38:14
After five months of preliminary review, the manuscript was rejected and resubmitted. However, it was quite easy to revise according to the review comments. I have already done it in the early stage, but this part of the content was not added. The revision and replies written exceeded 15 pages, and the revision comments of the editors and reviewers were answered earnestly. Resubmission after a total of 20 days of modification. Then the second trial was conducted for two months and was directly hired. Generally speaking, the editor is very responsible and the reviewers are also very friendly. I recommend everyone to submit to this journal.

(0) Thank | 啊呀切

Author: wysspz


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-10-11 08:43:22
The content of my paper is about common catalyst. The manuscript was submitted on July 2 and was sent for review the next day. The reviewer's comments received on August 15 were very pertinent. They gave a very practical suggestion and we revised it according to the reviewer's request. Revision submitted on September 5 and it was directly accepted on October 3. It took just three months and the speed was not bad. I hope the journal will get better and better!

(17) Thank | wysspz

Author: DH


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-15 19:16:17
2.22 Submission; 5.5 major revision; 5. 24 revised submission; 6.6 accept; 6.12 online. It was the third article during my graduate student period. It was a very good journal in the field of catalysis. Reviewer’s questions and suggestions were very helpful to improve the quality of the article.

(400) Thank | DH

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 催化
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-20 20:06:00
Catalysis Letters has a fast review process; the slowest experience I’ve had has been about 6 weeks. I frequently submit to this journal – I think I’ve submitted around 10 manuscripts by now. All but one have been accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: believeht


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-01 09:41:52
Submitted at the end of July, received at the end of October,After one major overhaul in the middle, one minor repair;It is very efficient for editors to process manuscripts. The questions raised by reviewers are more conventional. If there are no major problems, the articles will be smoother.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | believeht

Author: 余小贱


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-31 23:11:44
Speed ​​is still ok, submitted at the end of May, under review after 5 days, received the revised comments at the beginning of July, minor repair, more than 30 days.However, there are also several questions that are more difficult to answer. I have experimented with it, and revised it at 7.23 and accepted it at 7.28.In general, the speed can be fixed within 2 months.Impact factor is up 3 points, speed lever
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 余小贱

Author: tonycjlu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 08:24:55
Speed ​​is OK, the peer review is basically completed in two weeks, my editor is a little drag, everyI have to wait a week for him.3.26 submission, 4.27 overhaul, 5.20 recruitment, 5.26 publication.The overall speed is ok.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tonycjlu

Author: 丢丢


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-09 10:05:44
12Submission, received overhaul at the end of the month, and received a review opinion at the end of January. It was really drunk, lasted 3 months, in April.Received on the 8th, the final result is good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 丢丢

Author: 小念


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-06 07:49:48
is simply too slow, the first draft in May, until the middle of January, the message was accepted, and the news of the overhaul waited for one month
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小念

Author: 丢丢


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-16 17:36:42
is looking forward to it...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 丢丢

Author: 丢丢


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-16 17:36:35
looking forward to...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 丢丢

Author: xwgd8@mst.edu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-02 12:22:20
a very fast journal, published in less than two months...It is not the first time that letter
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xwgd8@mst.edu

Author: phoebe2003


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 11:04:06
2.23Submission 4.5 Overhaul 4.12 Modified Submission 5.10 Receive!The speed is not as fast as I can imagine, but it is okay, basically meeting the standard that can be accepted within 3 months!I wish the journal development.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | phoebe2003

Author: Bernice


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-02 09:26:58
Submitted by No. 12.23, and received comments on the review after 2.12. The reviewer gave very detailed revision comments. The editor is also very friendly. It will be revised on February 27.The manuscript was uploaded and told me to accept it in three days! Great!I wish you more and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Bernice

Author: 嘿嘿嘿


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-09 16:37:32
returned to the reviewer for almost 2 months, and it will take almost one month to receive it after the revision.From front to back, plus modification time, about 4 months.Editors and reviewers are very nice, wishing the journal better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 嘿嘿嘿

Author: ariel


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-16 13:22:59
first submitted chem comm, innovation is not enough to directly refuse.Then I switched to catal lett, and the result was assigned to the chief editor. It was probably too many things. It took more than two months to give the opinion of the overhaul. It took about two months to stay in the editor's hands. Later, it was probably time.It was almost arrived and was sent out to the reviewers.The data was replenished in one month and sent out two weeks later.Still very happy, accept it.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | ariel

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-30 21:38:11
is slow. I haven’t responded for a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 10:33:00
Where is the format requirement for this journal?How can I not find it? Help
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-13 09:14:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-02 18:35:00
May 30th contribution, about to get the news on June 1st is Major revision, in the revision!About a month, foreigners are still punctual!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-22 10:21:00
I want to select for this journal, there is no template, you can send it to me, thank you!Xiaozhu313131@163.com
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-29 09:51:00
I finally got one of the journals before I graduated. This journal is very fast. I refused to submit the manuscript within one week after the first submission last year.Time, this time, I re-submitted the experiment and resubmitted the manuscript. After reviewing the manuscript for more than 20 days, I gave it to Xiao Xiu. After submitting it for 3 days, I received it. The laboratory has submited four times and was rejected by the editor. It feels like I have passed the editing.The following is a smooth
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-14 12:19:00
I want to post articles on this side, I don’t know if the manuscript can have a template format?If you have any, please give one, thank you very much!Hxf6365@163.com
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-16 15:39:00
Ask your predecessors, what is the running head of the first step in the journal submission process?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-18 16:45:00
I submitted the manuscript on March 20th, the Under Review after ten days, the review draft on April 20th, and the original revision after three days.Make up the experiment, organize the data, submit it again after 1 week, and review it after about 1 week.It lasted for 50 days.After graduating from the undergraduate course, I chose Zhibo. This is my first book, and I am lucky. Oh!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [CATALYSIS LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service