Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | BIOTECHNOL LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0141-5492 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1573-6776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 3.50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/10529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/BILE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Semimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0141-5492%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: 42% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-08-03 22:42:00 In my opinion, this journal is rather easy to get published in – the journal only requires a small amount of innovation. The one-month review period is very reasonable, especially for graduate students who are looking to publish quickly. This is a great SCI journal. I do, however, recommend that all submissions are written in the format requested by the journal and that the language is polished prior to submission. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 914735630@qq.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-31 09:24:03 The article has been received, saying that it is 2-3 weeks online, but now it has been more than a month, no news, I don't know what happened, I dare not send an email to ask the editor. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 西瓜烤红薯 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-22 13:17:42 submitted for 2 weeks and received it directly.Happy ![]() ![]() |
Author: bz Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-10 09:37:06 The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice. ![]() ![]() |
Author: bz Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-10 09:36:56 The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-28 16:56:00 was rejected one month, before the brothers selectd an article, the editor reply similarity is too high, halo ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-19 16:17:00 Select Submission Classifications,,, can not be selected, is empty, dizzyNow!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-08-14 17:08:00 I submitted it in 13.8.12. The journal's submission system is not very useful.But the speed of review is as fast as many people say.13.8.12 Even in the evening, NEW SUBMISSION, 13.8.13 was already assigned by Editor in the morning, but I got the message in the morning of 13.8.14, because the content was too light and was directly rejected..Reject: results too slight*/results too preliminary* is the opinion given by Editor in chief, so it is more informative.We receive m ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-06 23:00:00 Just submitted an article today, insecticidal protein microcapsules,,, blessing can be....2 weeks, no information yet..Calm..Nearly 3 weeks of tragedy..It is said that the experiment is incomplete and it is recommended to do biometric tests..Halo, our lab can't do that.. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-05-25 18:08:00 Submitted for 2 months, the efficiency is high, as long as the content is new.The editor is very responsible. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-07 13:38:00 Two weeks after submission, return to review comments ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-03-22 11:27:00 I have been submiting for 20 days, and I have been NEW SUBMISSION. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-30 16:50:00 Writing in strict accordance with the requirements of the journal before submission, the review is very fast.Be novel, short and fine. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-29 22:55:00 Edit reply: We have removed your submission from our submission queue. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-11-03 11:08:00 under review 3 weeks, seeking calm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-08-23 23:53:00 Please consult, after the revision is submitted, is it in the state of Editor Assigned?How long does it usually give the result ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-06-12 15:39:00 as long as the article is innovative, it is quite fast.I have revised comments after 1 week of submission, minor repairs.Be carefully revised according to the reviewer's comments, especially paying attention to the format of the article.Prepare to return the revised comments in these two days, I hope everything goes well~~~:) ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-04-21 17:25:00 Submitted in the previous period, was pitted, rejected after 2 revisions, saying that my last modification did not meet the requirements.Directly rejected, without any detailed reasons. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-04-20 09:40:00 I would like to ask this journal is a few districts ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-02-26 08:15:00 reviewing the speed is very fast, what is the December 27th select, January 20th notice overhaul,Return to 3 days to receive ~ Note that the modification should meet the requirements of the BL itself for each part, such as the number of words in the abstract, etc., strictly follow the author guidence to write well ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-01-10 20:18:00 format and language requirementsHigh, review is fast, the article requires a short and precise, slightly innovative. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-29 13:01:00 format and language requirements are high, review is fast, three days to give a letter of rejection, the article requires a short and fine, slightlyInnovative can ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-09 10:49:00 20101.768 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-11-21 19:27:00 must have a new format to be changed in advance to change at least almost ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-10-09 08:57:00 feelingIt is relatively easy, and the quality requirements of the article are not very high. Many teachers and students in China have selectd here. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |