X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Royal Society Open Science

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[Royal Society Open Science]Hello, you are Visitor Number 25004 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleRoyal Society Open Science
Journal Title AbbreviationsROY SOC OPEN SCI
ISSN2054-5703
h-index28
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.000.9661.147
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Multidisciplinary
Subcategory: Multidisciplinary
Q112 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)3.20%
Official Websitehttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rsos
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaMultidisciplinary
Country/Area of Publication
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume692
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2054-5703%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Royal Society Open Science】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Royal Society Open Science: Write a review
Author: kmchen


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-11 13:49:24
01.19.2019 created; 01.24.2019 submitted; 01.25.2019 in process; 02.07.2019 under review; 03.29.2019 awaiting decision; 04.12.2019 in process; 04.15.2019 accept with minor revision; 04.19.2019 in process; 04.29.2019 unsubmitted with a minor issue; 04.30.2019 in process; 05.28.2019 awaiting decision; 05.28.2019 accept as is; 05.28.2019 sent to production; 06.03.2019 awaiting production checklist; 06.04.2019 awaiting payment; 06.12.2019 sent to production; 07.10.2019 published online. The initial review took nearly 3 months. The overall process is slow.

(1) Thank | kmchen

Author: 博佳


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-02 19:52:08
Rejected by RSC AD, and then transferred to RSOS. This is the first SCI article in my life. First submission on December 28, 2018, then in process; Under review on January 15, 2019; Under review on February 19; In process on February 24; Notification of minor revision on February 26; Submission of revised manuscripts on March 4, then in process; Awaiting decision on March 25; Sent to production on March 26.

(3) Thank | 博佳

Author: 博佳


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-02 19:50:54
First submission on December 28, 2018, then in process; Under review on January 15, 2019; Under review on February 19; In process on February 24; Notification of minor revision on February 26; Submission of revised manuscripts on March 4, then in process; Awaiting decision on March 25; Sent to production on March 26.

(1) Thank | 博佳

Author: 893482592@qq.com


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-05 09:59:55
To be honest, this journal is not particularly demanding for innovation. As for my article, the reviewer's opinion is that the innovation is insufficient, the research method can still be tried and modified, and some calculation methods were questioned. After rewriting the paper, the second reviewerthought I had made great revisions but my English still needed to be strengthened due to all of the grammatical mistakes. My paper was finally accepted and sent to production. Although this is an open source journal, the review process is really slow, and I hope that it will improve.

(1) Thank | 893482592@qq.com

Author: MiaZ


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-14 19:26:17
After submiting in RSC Advances, it is recommended to switch to RSOS.25 days in the first trial, received directly 4 days after the repairThe review speed is very fast, and the opinions are desirable.2017 SCI Chinese Academy of Sciences 3 District, the latest change in 2018 to SCI Chinese Academy of Sciences 4 DistrictOverall, the new journal hopes to be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | MiaZ

Author: wrw


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-15 16:30:57
has been submitteding for half a month, the editor has not passed the initial review, is it so slow?
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | wrw

Author: 杨猫


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 17:26:59
The RSC advances are recommended to be changed to the journal. The editorial opinions are quite pertinent. During the revision period, a lot of content was added and the stage of re-learning.Submitted on June 16, overhauled on July 10, and received on August 3.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 杨猫

Author: admin@steven-zhu.me


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-01 10:40:02
RSC A is inexplicable reason after being rejected, recommend this toJournal, then review related articles in this journalStill responsible for the editor of RSC A, the second review was rejected because of inexplicable reasons, recommending a re-submitment, actuallyThey had been reviewing the paper for too long. In order to avoid increasing their average review time, I refused to re-submit after revising the manuscript according to the revised opinion. The third submitment was about one and a half months.When rsos is not sci, the quality of journals is indeed very high, but it is not clear now. Regular or regular, it is a bit pit. From October last year to September this year, this one is considered dusty, during my otherTwo of the three papers were accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | admin@steven-zhu.me

Author: 1455665678@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-10 17:06:55
New journal process is a bit troublesome
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1455665678@qq.com

Author: jfei


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-03 23:18:03
The speed is already very fast, and the reviewer's opinion is very pertinent~ After the overhaul,
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jfei

Author: bochen2012@whut.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-21 21:25:51
10Submission 28, sent to the external audit after 2 days, the overhaul opinion given on January 9th, and the revised draft was returned on January 26, during which the data was uploaded to the journal cooperation database and revised again.Return to the final version in February and accept on March 21.The overall feeling of the new journal is not bad. It is to return to the revised manuscript to pay attention to the end of the article according to the requirements, especially the data accessibility section to upload data to the dryad, a little trouble.Finally, I wish the new journals better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | bochen2012@whut.edu.cn

Author: cdut.zhao


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-26 14:24:26
Then, I feel that the overall situation is general. After submitting the manuscript, I will go to the external audit. I will go through the external audit for four months, overhaul, and return to more than 20 days to inform the recruitment. Now I have started to accept the face fee.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | cdut.zhao

Author: jari226@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-09 17:33:19
Investing in RSC Advances was recommended to change the journal, which seems to have not been included in SCI.September 19 delivery October 26 minor repair, seven days to modify.Accepted on November 8.New journals hope to be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jari226@126.com

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Royal Society Open Science]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service