My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE Access

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE Access]Hello, you are Visitor Number 246431 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE Access
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE ACCESS
ISSN2169-3536
h-index56
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.900.7751.734
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q2155 / 460
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Engineering
Q147 / 299
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Computer Science
Q145 / 221

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)35.10%
Official Websitehttps://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ieee-access
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume14985
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2169-3536%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE Access】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/16)
  Reviews on IEEE Access: Write a review
Author: 风雪星月夜


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-18 12:19:03
Recruitment after re-submitment~ first trial, assign AE a week for a total of 20 days, 4 reviewers, 3 accepts, 1 reject, AE request re-request after modification;Re-submitment in the next day, the same AE is assigned in a week, a total of 23 days, 3 reviewers, all accept, no comments, AE accept ~ ~ from the record to the record, a total of 45 days ~ ~ difficulty and subject professional, speed andReviewer related ~~
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | 风雪星月夜

Author: ml大法好


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-06 10:38:18
, the review speed is very fast. It is said that each reviewer only agrees to review the manuscript.One week's review time, my paper has three reviewers, two accepts, one Reject (update and resubmit encouraged), and the last editor's opinion is modified after accept. The review comments are very professional, and I hope the journals are getting better and better..
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | ml大法好

Author: 小飞哥


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-05 14:42:08
Manuscript No.: 20xxx, the amount of manuscript is quite large
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小飞哥

Author: 六道仙人


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 10:09:32
How long does it take for your Access to assign AE?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 六道仙人

Author: echo与呆子


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-29 10:20:05
"The middle process really feels very long. Reading a blog is a difficult journey for me. It is not smart enough. I haven't had a good idea when I read so many papers. I didn't have a master's degree.After writing an English thesis, Shuobo is not a professional. I almost gave up before I saw hope. I thank myself for my persistence. I am also fortunate to have a good tutor. I have a serious and responsible little tutor who gives me selflessness in my most difficult time.The help of the small papers is reached, the big papers are not enough, and we will continue to work hard. I wish you good luck and bravely stick to it~~"
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | echo与呆子

Author: echo与呆子


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-29 10:13:00
The third AE and ADM were completely different from the second one, so they started to worry again. I later figured out that if they refused, there was only one reason for innovation, so I must appeal.A lot of complicated models can't be reproduced at all. I am very practical, although it doesn't look advanced.The newly added three reviewers, the two received a rejection, the one that refused is also more interesting, saying that my paper is practical, more suitable for a journal, and this journal is my top publication in this field, I really thank him.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | echo与呆子

Author: echo与呆子


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-29 10:03:04
My submission experience:6.25--7.17 Unassigned AE (ADM email tells me that the grammar is not available, resubmitted and submitted)8.5--9.15 (9.4 allocation of AE and ADM) received one-on-one rejection, encouraged re-submitment, the two reviewers did not put forward any substantive comments9.30--10.23 (10.8 Assign AE and ADM) Three new reviewers' comments, two receipts and one rejection, refused to encourage re-submitment, AE agreed to receiveMindful journey: I waited for 20 days for the first time and said that the grammar could not work. It took more than a week to work with a small tutor, one sentence at a time, 15 hours a day.The effect of improving the time of more than a week is very obvious. Later, although the reviewer pointed out some problems, he wrote well written in writing.The opinions of the second reviewer were better.The most worrying thing is that my paper is not innovative enough. I am writing about the innovation of a framework. I have made the motivation of this framework design very clear. Then the experiment also verified the validity of this framework. Maybe they rebutted it.It's hard to say that innovation is not enough.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | echo与呆子

Author: cyany


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-21 10:38:35
This journal 2018 partition may become the second district?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | cyany

Author: 副叫兽


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-17 10:42:29
Two reviewers in the first instance, one for a minor repair.After the minor repair, the AE was distributed for half a month, and after another half a month, there was no movement.What is the situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 副叫兽

Author: 中


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-15 10:20:24
Very cool, modified after accept
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 中

Author: 蚊子


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-12 09:43:34
9.16-day submission10.8 notification receptionThe review is super fast!Two reviewers were assigned and all received directly.I thought it would be good to submit in Access. After I recorded it, I was ready to send a higher level of journals~As far as I can see, the best thing about this journal is the comprehensive journal. After all, I selectd this article and sci was directly rejected by the editor..Thank you for this journal!I wish the better the better ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 蚊子

Author: 啦啦啦你一脸


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-12 08:41:08
received 9.20Accepted 10.6Faster than the first timeBoth are three reviewers, all directly receivedThe quality of journals is not evaluated. The amount of early articles is small. IF is naturally high.With the increase in the number of publications in the past two years, the late IF may naturally fall.The first comprehensive journal of IEEE is currently looking at the quality control of the editorial department. At least three reviewers are more rigorous than aip advances energies.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 啦啦啦你一脸

Author: L


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 16:15:12
Two and a half months gave the first-instance opinion, seven reviewers, one refused to draft, two refused to encourage re-submitment, four minor repairs.Being revised, I hope that efforts will have good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | L

Author: LiuMY


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-06 15:04:31
The article was submitted before TPS, modified many times, and then changed to Access.Submitted in early July, ADM and AE were allocated in early August, and acceptd at the end of August.The three reviewers, the comments are very pertinent.The review of the journal is quite fast, but there are too many manuscripts, and the allocation of editors and deputy editors will be slower.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | LiuMY

Author: dreamer


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-06 10:37:11
First reviewers, 5 reviewers, 3 rejections, 2 rejections, edits to reissue after revision.Crying to death, how to review so many people in the first trial
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | dreamer

Author: sophie


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-13 10:28:04
and selectd for an article, and also reviewed many papers in the journal.Basically, they are two reviewers in the first instance, two reviewers in the second instance, and four reviewers.Each review is assigned to edit for two weeks, and the reviewer is given a review time of one week, giving results for about 40 days.Objectively speaking, journals are not very easy, but they are not comparable to the big cattle journals.Therefore, the Great God detours on its own, and everyone treats these journals objectively and fairly. There is no need to compete with boring people. Individuals just want to give some reference to people who really want to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | sophie

Author: SB346


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-12 09:13:02
SB346 SB346 SB346
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | SB346

Author: SB345


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 17:51:04
So many SBs this year, really speechless
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | SB345

Author: qewr


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 11:58:12
This is an old journal!!!The old man forced
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | qewr

Author: KKing


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-09 09:06:13
Hey, before the PR, someone in the journal, he also thinks that the two journals are about the same level...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | KKing

Author: Lee


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 15:04:34
Don’t bother, I just got to know the journal. Objectively speaking, from the editor to the Editor Board to the Most Popular Paper, it’s really convincing. In addition, it’s very good for IEEE ACCESS.The articles have more than 20-30 pages, the content is indeed OK, anyway, I selectd for the journal, it is already OK for my level
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Lee

Author: xiaoba


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 12:23:05
Say this journal is fast, in fact, the journal is fast in the first instance.The reviewers are less procrastinating and the editing efficiency is very high.Some traditional journals are slow because the processing speed is too slow. Generally speaking, the light distribution editor will go up one month, and the reviewer will look for another half a month, and the reviewer will drag it again. The time of the first trial will beIt usually lasts for 3-6 months, even reaching one year.If the journal is not directly received in the first instance, the speed will be slower, and each submission to the distribution of AE is generally more than 20 days.In the near future, the ADM team of the journal may be expanded, and ADM will be allocated within 15 days.The comprehensive level of the journal is not the top publication, but it is by no means a water journal. Many of the AE team are sitting in the town. Although the reviewers who are looking for it are not in the same level, they are all insiders, and the review comments are generally more serious.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | xiaoba

Author: kayla


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 09:25:13
The first time to share the submission experience, submitted in mid-February, the re-rejection was repeated twice in the middle, and it was received at the end of August. It took more than half a year and did not feel good.The revision is also very hardworking.If you pay, you will have a return. I hope everyone can get good results. Come on!
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | kayla

Author: 666


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 20:04:08
I don't care about this journal, I haven't selectd, and I have no plans to select.But I took a look at the comments, Beihang that person is quite stupid hahaha
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 666

Author: access


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 17:05:01
ieeer buddy, I don’t understand a bit. You look down on this journal and don’t select for it. You’re still reading the comments here every day...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | access

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/16)

Start your review of [IEEE Access]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service