Journal Recommendation
Selecting a reputable journal in which to present your work is an important step for a successful publication strategy. Some research fields have thousands of journals, and most authors find the selection process difficult. Choosing the wrong journal can mean rejection or a long review, both of which delay publication. With LetPub’s Journal Recommendation service, papers are matched to editors with relevant subject matter expertise. All of our editors are frequently invited to serve as reviewers by scientific journals and they have experience publishing and reviewing articles of all types (e.g., original research, reviews, case reports, surveys, and short communications). They have advanced degrees (PhD and MD) or professional and educational backgrounds, and there is an editor for every discipline, such as clinical medicine, chemistry, physics, engineering, life sciences, and social sciences. They will assess the key scientific factors in your manuscript and recommend suitable journals to ensure an efficient publication process.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the first 3 recommendations do not meet the needs you specify at the time service purchase, we will provide 2 complimentary recommendations to supplement your target journal selection list.
Any author-specified restrictions, including index restrictions, may limit the options that can be provided or require concessions to other parameters of the recommendation process. Recommendation of a journal does not guarantee acceptance. Rejection is entirely at the discretion of the journal and may occur for a variety of reasons for which LetPub does not hold responsibility, including being out of scope. For further information, see our FAQ.
Zhen Tang
Institute of Karst Geology of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
Ning Wang
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityThe second edit was very good, and it was accepted after the overhaul was posted. Original: Women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obese had increased risk of having newborns with macrosomia and LGA than normal-weight women, both unadjusted and adjusted for all the potential confounders. After modification: Women who were overweight or obese pre-pregnancy manifested an increased risk of having newborns with macrosomia and LGA relative to normal-weight women, regardless of whether values were unadjusted or adjusted for all potential confounders.
Zhongxing Huang
Guangdong Institute of BioengineeringThis is the fourth time to ask LetPub to help polish the language. After LetPub edited the article, it was greatly improved and was recognized by editors and reviewers. We will continue to cooperate with LetPub in the future!!
Guilong Zhang
Binzhou Medical UniversityThe language of the article is polished in LetPub, and the revision is very good. The entire submission process is also very smooth, and the reviewers all praise the language of the paper!
Youjia Zeng
Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalThe editing of LetPub articles is timely and professional. They helped change my previous work must use the "passive voice" stereotype thinking. Thank you LetPub!
Tao Chen
Beihang UniversityThe articles on biomaterials were successfully accepted by the MSEC after the professional editing of LetPub. The service is great!
Nan Sun
Tsinghua University (China)We used LetPub’s English language editing service, our paper was revised three times, and each time was very professional and detailed. We contacted the Client Communications Specialist by email throughout the whole process, they answered our doubts patiently, and the processing speed was very fast. Many thanks for LetPub's professional and meticulous service, and it is very helpful for future paper writing.
Shuaishuai Cheng
Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesThank you LetPub very much for the professional editing of manuscripts, short editing cycle, and language modification.
Loading......
The paper editing service is very professional, and some grammatical errors and formatting errors in the paper have been corrected. The reviewers are very satisfied with the language expression of the paper. Great!