X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Frontiers in Pharmacology

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[Frontiers in Pharmacology]Hello, you are Visitor Number 29564 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleFrontiers in Pharmacology
Journal Title AbbreviationsFRONT PHARMACOL
ISSN1663-9812
h-index62
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.001.2281.197
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Medicine
Subcategory: Pharmacology (medical)
Q260 / 237
Category: Medicine
Subcategory: Pharmacology
Q294 / 301

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.00%
Official Websitehttp://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/pharmacology
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.frontiersin.org/submission/submissioninfo.aspx
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume1514
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1663-9812%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Frontiers in Pharmacology】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Frontiers in Pharmacology: Write a review
Author: 一只科研小傻瓜


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-12 15:12:54
Received date: 31 Aug 2019; Final validation date: 10 Mar 2020. It basically takes less than a month for the review and submission of revision. This article was delayed for so long because of some small episodes. After the first submission of revision, the two reviewers raised many comments. The first reviewer required major revision, the second one didn’t raise any comment. After the submission of revision, the first reviewer accepted it, and the second one closed the comments. A month later, the third reviewer was found by the editor; reply was given, major revision was required, and many comments were raised. After several revisions, the third reviewer agreed to accept it. On the second day, the editor asked me to modify the figures and tables. On the third day after the revision, proof was required by the editor. It was my first submission, and there were many episodes during the period. I sent emails to the editor several times. I was very sad, but I thank the editor for listening to my opinions. I think it is important to answer the reviewers’ questions in detail, patiently and rigorously. In addition, the figures and tables should be made carefully and serious, so that the reviewers will feel the serious attitude of the contributor. I feel that these two reasons saved me from the situation of major revisions.

(6) Thank | 一只科研小傻瓜

Author: 0321


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-11 10:48:14
Pharmacokinetics research (including rats, dogs, humans). The manuscript was submitted in October, the editor asked ethical questions about dogs three times, especially the question that how to deal with dogs after the experiment? I answered the question and supplement it in the text, which took one month. I remind you all to answer the questions carefully, patiently, and meticulously. The editor suggested me changing the field of submission to clinical research. The author submitted the article to the field of clinical research. It was under interact review on January 7, and the comments of reviewers were available, and major revision was required. One of the reviewers was extremely serious, who raised many questions, and the article was revised several times during the period. All the reviewers were satisfied on February 28. It was accepted on March 10. I feel that the reviewers were very professional and serious, and I learned a lot in the process of revision.

(1) Thank | 0321

Author: deng1991


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-23 00:49:13
Seeing that the quality of papers in this journal is not that high, I submitted a paper that had been rejected by another Q4 journal. The journal did accept our paper after some minor revision, and it was soon published. But we had to pay a very high publication fee. I then wanted to submit another one, but my advisor said we should try to publish in classic journals in the future. My advisor said we should avoid this journal, not wasting research funds on the expensive publication fee, and we are also worried that a journal with this a high publication fee will not have a good reputation in the future.

(59) Thank | deng1991

Author: nancy333


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-12 10:55:52
Ask the heroes, the answer to each question in the frontiers in pharmacology's proof form, how do you get back?For example, to confirm whether the email address is normal, is it replying to accurate or replying?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | nancy333

Author: 苦尽甘来求保佑


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 09:01:00
is the full experience of Liu Huaming.Uploaded on June 8thTransfer to interactive review on July 28thSupplementary experiment 1 month, first repair on August 21Advice on August 30September 6 reviewer1 status becomes inactiveAdded two reviewers on September 8The original reviewer 2 endorsed on September 16Reviewer 4 made recommendations on September 21Reviewer 4 endorsed on September 24thSeptember 27 acceptNearly four months of waiting and accidents, reviewers are still very pertinent to make various suggestions and amendments.I am still waiting for proof. How long will it take to be online?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 苦尽甘来求保佑

Author: tainingyxw@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-26 13:14:31
On January 29th, the reviewer on May 2nd, used a month to make up the experiment, and on June 6th, the reviewer also suggested, and then fill the data, June 18th notice received, agreed to publish, June 26 paid the page fee, different time can see the journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tainingyxw@163.com

Author: tainingyxw@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-26 13:14:09
Submitted on January 29, reviewer on May 2Opinions, used a month to make up the experiment, and then selectd again on June 6th. The reviewer still has suggestions, and then supplemented the data. On June 18th, the notice was received, and the consent was published. On June 26, the page fee was paid.Can see the publication
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tainingyxw@163.com

Author: 川大 DDS


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-18 19:13:24
The previous article took about a month and a half to receive. This article has been selectd for 1 month, or independent review, the reviewer's speed is a bit slow this year...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 川大 DDS

Author: 川大 DDS


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-18 19:13:09
The previous article took about one and a half months to receiveThis article has been selectd for 1 month, or independent review, the reviewer's speed this year is a bit slow...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 川大 DDS

Author: LL


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-17 16:13:44
Excuse me, if the reviewer agrees to accept it, is the chance of the editor accepting it?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | LL

Author: Felix


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-24 22:40:49
has been modified twice, very good journal, reviewer's opinion is on the idea, but Switzerland's frontiers series of journals will charge a relatively high page fee, internationally know thisIf it is a charge, it is a water journal, then you still go around.The price of communication under Nature is also very high!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Felix

Author: yjswei@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-25 16:12:02
What is the layout fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yjswei@163.com

Author: yjswei@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-25 16:12:00
What is the layout fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yjswei@163.com

Author: yjswei@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-25 16:11:59
What is the layout fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yjswei@163.com

Author: yjswei@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-25 16:11:55
What is the layout fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yjswei@163.com

Author: alexfabulous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-01 15:06:43
Very good journal, the requirements are very strict, but the editor is very nice.If you say that the people of the water journal are not here, you will not comment on it. If you select for ten in this journal, even if you are powerful, don't be lucky enough to think that it is very easy.Again, the purpose of doing research is different, and the mentality is different.Some wonderful things don't think that their own research is very strong, and they have the ability to select for CNS. If you don't have the ability, don't say it here.
Show Review in Original Language
(57) Thank | alexfabulous

Author: zhourose


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-22 09:48:46
Super expensive layout fee, hydrological recycling station!Rich labs can still be considered, and the hit rate is high!The review is fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zhourose

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Frontiers in Pharmacology]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service