Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

5.30, submission. 7.18, a minor revision was notified, and two reviewers believed that the paper had contributed to the research in the field and could be accepted after revision. We mainly revised the grammar and contents. 7.25, revised submission. 7.28, accepted. The review speed is very fast, and the editor is very responsible. Basically, if you have any questions, you will get the reply within one working day.

(1) Thank | dedwed

It was submitted in March 2020 and accepted in July. It was a total of three and a half months. The assigned academic editor was super responsible, the reviewer dealt with the news immediately, and the reviewer would be invited immediately on the day of the revised submission. Thank you very much. The reviewers of the first review delayed some time, about two months, but their comments were pertinent; the second review speed was very fast.

(4) Thank | 初心369

13 October, 2019 Submitted; 10 December, 2019 Major Revision Required; 8 January, 2020 Revised Version Received; 18 January, 2020 Minor Revision Required; 16 January, 2020 Revised Version Received; 216 January, 2020 Accepted. The review efficiency is very high, and the results and responses are received very fast. As a graduate, my first paper was accepted by a SCI journal. (1) The type of submission was "Advanced Techniques in Machine Learning for Neural Data Processing"; (2) The issues raised by the editor in the major revision stage were also quite pertinent. The workload of the new experiments was very large. We supplemented the experiments required by the editor were completed one by one. At the same time, the explanations and responses to all questions were very detailed, and the editor was very satisfied. (3) The minor revision stage is mainly about writing and grammar, not about experimental corrections. (4) The latest IF is 2.2, which is in a steadily rising state.

(13) Thank | 陈府

10 October, 2017 Submitted; 30 November, 2017 Minor Revision Required; 7 December, 2017 Revised Version Received; 20 December, 2017 Accepted. The review process is highly efficient, and the final result will usually be given in two or three months. Although it is an open access journal, the review is rigorous and the paper must be novel. The latest IF is 1.125, much higher than last year. Minor revision means the comments are relatively easy to address and the revised manuscript will not be reviewed by the reviewers during the second round, but will be reviewed by the editor, and then the editor will decide whether to request revision or accept.

(0) Thank | wanghlbb@126.com

2018.06.06Submission, then assign the editor, change the editing three times during the period, now it is 2011.07.05, the manuscript is in the fourth editor's hands.I hope there is a good result, come on.

(0) Thank | 08ge

10 October, 2017 Submitted30 November, 2017 Minor Revision Required7 December, 2017 Revised Version Received20 December, 2017 AcceptedThe review draft is highly efficient, and the final result will usually be given in two or three months.Although it is an open journal, the review of the journal is relatively rigorous and must be innovative.The latest IF is 1.125, a lot more than last time.If it is a minor repair, this means that the opinions are relatively pertinent, and there are not many places to be modified.Then the revised manuscript will not be reviewed by the reviewer for the second time, but will be reviewed by the editor, and then the editor will decide whether to modify it or whether to accept it.

(13) Thank | wanghlbb@126.com

The first part of the undergraduate course acceptd SCI, Received 4 June 2017; Revised 1 October 2017; Accepted 22 October2017.

(3) Thank | imroxaswc@gmail.com

Received 29 February 2016;Revised 2 May 2016;Accepted 9 May 2016

(3) Thank | Jacy