International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

9.20, submission; 9.23, provided ethical license; 9.24, under review; 10.18, major revision. 10.28, resubmitted; 11.05, minor revision; 11.11, accept. It took nearly two months, and the reviewers were very responsible, who raised 40 questions in the first review. There were more than 20 pages of reply. After careful revision, the article was greatly improved. The editor was also very responsible and responded quickly if there was any question.

(5) Thank | newcomer

Aug. 30 submission; Aug. 30 under review; Nov. 18 major revision; Nov. 30 revision manuscript; Oct. 2 minor revision; Oct. 5 revision manuscript; Oct. 7 accepted. I gained greatly from this, and I wish the journal will get better and better!

(5) Thank | 张德帅

June 17 Submission; June 18 The editor is Aggie Zheng, who is very good, and you will get a reply soon if you send an email to her. June 19 Sending for external review; July 15 The opinions of two external review experts returned. One was very good and agreed with our research; the other was very negative and raised many questions, but it did point out the main issue of the article. Finally, the editor decided to reject the manuscript. The first time I submitted to a SSCI journal, the gain was greater than the result. Good luck to everyone ~

(5) Thank | njdyj

9.2 submission; 9.4 under review; 9.13 major revision; 9.22 minor revision; 9.22 accepted; 9.28 published online. We just published a study on environmental materials in pollution control. The whole process was less than a month. The speed is very fast, and the publication fee is very expensive, so it is particularly suitable for those who urgently need a publication and no shortage of funds. IF=2.101, Q3, so not bad. 4 reviewers, 3 agreed to accept, 1 suggested rejection. The assistant editor gave the decision of major revision. We spent a week to add experiments, and after we submitted the revised,  got a decision of minor revision. The reviewer who suggested rejection raised some critical questions and gave a lot of comments, but those indeed helped us to improve the manuscript. Assistant editor Miya Zhang is very efficient. As long as the manuscript has some novelty, won’t be too difficult to get accepted here.

(3) Thank | davinci

Open source journals require approximately 1w of page fee.The research team has money and is more eager to select. From submiting to receiving the draft for a total of 2 months, it has been overhauled twice and the editor is very serious.Listening to a guest editor said that there are nearly 50% rejection rate, so there are still certain requirements, can not be taken lightly.

(0) Thank | nxxkkxx

It's extremely fast, and reviewers return opinions quickly.I selectd for one, minor repair, direct accept, and also included in SSCI.However, submission is still difficult, many people are rejected by the second, so in order to facilitate peer exchange, a qq group has been established: Welcome to the penguin group discussion: 658902184

(0) Thank | Guojin

Very good journal, the editor of the journal is also very powerful.The processing is very timely and much faster than many journals.Take the graduation.Also specially built the QQ group: 785268896

(0) Thank | 齐德隆东墙

After submitting the manuscript for one month, it will be overhauled. After the repair, it will be given a minor repair in the second half of the month.If you don't have money and you are in a hurry, you can try it

(2) Thank | lll

Personally feel that this journal review is very professional and very serious.The reviewer returned to the comments about one month, and there were many opinions, but there were indeed problems; the second trial returned more than 20 days, or was overhauled; the third trial was received.The overall sense of academic editors and reviewers are more responsible.Hope that the journal will take it to the next level!

(2) Thank | 模型人

Review comments are very professional, but very tolerant and not harsh.

(0) Thank | entox

high fees, open source journals, but speedFast, one return revisionBasic three reviewers.I have submited so many journals, I think MDPI is still relatively good, and the quality requirements are not high.Do not select for your academic reputation.

(0) Thank | 琪儿

Open source journal, although charges,However, the overall efficiency is very high. There will be no news after several months of not being sent out; the three reviewers are still very professional; the editing assistants are very timely and the editing process is fast.If you are in a hurry, you can choose the journal.The whole process is roughly as follows:6.4 submission6.4 under review6.20 major revision6.29 resubmitted manuscript6.29 under review7.2 however editor decision7.6 accepted

(0) Thank | Amy

Reviewing for one month, the opinion is quite professional, and the point of interest in the journal is estimated to be the Gene-environment interactions.Environmental genomics and proteomics) should be easier to relate to environmental genes.

(1) Thank | sethlee0010@yahoo.com

Very fast, it was repaired in 20 days, and it was received soon.It is an epidemiological study on environmental pollutants and female reproductive function.

(3) Thank | xh

The review period is relatively fast, and it will definitely give review opinions for about 1 month. It seems that the journal of Zone 3

(2) Thank | beyond.hehe@163.com