Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Journal of Optics | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J OPTICS-UK | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2040-8978 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2040-8986 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 5.50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2040-8986 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/jopt-iop | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | IOP Publishing Ltd, TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | OPTICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 272 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2040-8978%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Journal of Optics: | Write a review |
Author: L_Cherish Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-12-11 12:40:51 Very good journal for the field. Has quite high standard for novelty. Research that is mostly on theory but lacks experimental studies can consider this journal, and it does not charge the page fee! I submitted the manuscript at the end of August. Two reviewers, one asked for minor revision and the other major revision; I was given one month. After revision, one reviewer accepted, and the other asked for minor revision; I got two weeks this time. Accepted in early December! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 光学科研者 Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-10-24 02:37:24 On July 5th, the manuscript was submitted. On September 3rd, the review comments were returned. Both reviewers were accepted but minor repairs were required; two weeks were revised, and the revised manuscript was uploaded on September 15, and received on October 1. ![]() ![]() |
Author: JOptics Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-08-27 17:40:09 has a good reputation in the industry, although the impact factor is a bit small, probably because it focuses on traditional optics and laser technology, otherwise the impact factor will be faster.The disadvantage is that the review is slightly slower, and the advantages are not published! ![]() ![]() |
Author: hehe Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-11 19:56:26 The manuscript is wrong, this is a fake, is the cottage of the Indian springer, not sci, IOP that is true..... ![]() ![]() |
Author: rp Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-03 20:05:12 16 selectd in November, 18 years in January is still reviewing status. ![]() ![]() |
Author: dnywwp Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-25 14:42:06 8-26 Submission10-17 Review comments returned11-08 Uploading a revised draft11-24 Officially acceptdThe reviewers looked very carefully and the questions were straightforward.The review speed of the two reviewers is also fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-14 06:03:07 J.O's article focuses on the combination of theoretical experiments. Although the impact factor is not up, the industry has a good reputation, but it is a pity that it was rejected. ![]() ![]() |
Author: optics Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-20 12:36:55 Reviewed for two months, but the results were okay, and they were acceptd within 1 month after the minor repair.Journals with very good reputation, even if the impact factor is not very high, but more optimistic. ![]() ![]() |
Author: victim Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-13 09:13:26 The links you gave are too pitted! ![]() ![]() |
Author: HHG Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-09 08:33:50 reviewers were very professional and very pertinent, but unfortunately rejected.This journal is not good, the volume of submission is not high, it is low-key but has weight, and I hope that it can be re-submited after revision. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-23 19:55:23 The volume of this journal is only about 300 in a year, but the quality of the paper is actually very high, focusing on theory or theory combined with experiment.The first-instance overhaul of the thesis was submitted after one and a half months of supplementary experiments, and the second trial was accepted one month. ![]() ![]() |
Author: niming Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-09 19:48:45 rejected by OE, selectd for this journal, 1The first-and-a-half-month first-instance opinion, the two reviewers recommended the publication, and received it directly after half a month. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 11 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-10-30 19:57:36 There are no review opportunities, and they are rejected.After being submitted for 10 days, I was rejected because of the high quality of Wu and the lack of great contribution to scientific research. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-15 08:32:00 The impact factor is a bit high now.Submission is a bit difficult, and the draft rate is now high.At the time of submission, it will not be submitted for review directly. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-31 12:23:00 Presidents, I selectd for an article about optical inspection, it has been 15 days, and I have not given the official Article ID, seeking for the seniors to confuse ing... ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-30 07:57:00 How is it so slow, the status of in progress has been 20 days, is this the case? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-11 19:38:00 The impact factor has risen, the difficulty is big, and the papers without experiments are actually rejected because of the scope of their submissions.It is getting harder and harder now! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-05-12 10:59:00 Journal of Optics, which was rejected by Optics Letters.I found several batches before and after, a total of 8 reviewers, many people unable to give a report, and delayed some time.Submission to direct provisionally accept, only took 6 weeks (two reviewers recommended to publish, only one mentions need to change typo), changed a few typo and officially received 1 week. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-29 15:07:00 Journal of Optics is the previous Journal of Optics A: pure optics and appled optics ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |