SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH

The paper’s content is about establishing the relationship between soil physical properties (with emphasis on soil water) and yield under conservation tillage conditions. 16 Jul 2019 Submit; 23 Dec 2019 Major revision; 05 Feb 2020 Accept; 12 Feb 2020 Online. The first review took a long time and the external review opinions were very objective. Special thanks to the editor Peng from Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for his efficiency in handling the manuscript and for giving responsible and objective opinions on the article.

(6) Thank | 玻璃晴朗

A few days ago, I submitted an article about the formation process of soil aggregates. The editor Rainer Horn rejected the manuscript because it did not meet the scope of the journal. It was recommended to transfer to Geoderma or Geoderma Regional. I don't know if it was because the article quality (language, innovation, or others) did not meet the standards and got rejected, or it really did not meet the scope of the journal...

(0) Thank | 韩朔

The first article was submitted to the journal. It was submitted on January 17th and accepted on August 1st. The editors are very good and they put forward a lot of excellent revision comments to the article. The reviewers are also very professional. They accepted the article directly after major revision and minor revisions. I am very happy that the article is accepted by this journal. I expect that I could write more articles soon to submit to this journal.

(2) Thank | Chris_gu

The journal is the International Soil and Farming Organization (ISTRO) in 1981. Founded by Elsevier, the journal began with a focus on mechanized farming, followed by different land use methods (including farming, fertilization, publishing, and other agronomic measures) on soil physics, chemistry, and biology. The impact of the journal is a good in the field of soil science. Review speed is generally 3-6 months, and the document will be published online within 1-2 months of acceptance. The acceptance rate is about 30%.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

23-Feb-2018 submitted25-Feb-2018 with editor,27-Feb-2018 under review05-Jun-2018 major review04-Jul-2018 submitted22-Sep-2018 minor revision08-Oct-2018 submitted15-Oct-2018 under review21-Dec-2018 accepted

(12) Thank | Dr Hua

2018.1 Submission2018.4 overhaul2018.5. Revised back2018.7 minor repair2018.7 repaired backLong time with editor2018.9under reviewAccepted 2018.10The time span is still relatively large

(1) Thank | 猪头三四

I would like to consult all of you who have selectd for this issue. The June submission shows the reviewer invited, but now there is no status, and all stages are 0, which is not submitted successfully.?Still can't see the status during the review?A little anxious.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I would like to inquire about the great gods who have selectd for this issue. The submission in June shows that reviewer invited, but now there is no status, and all stages are 0, which is not submitted successfully.?Still can't see the status during the review?A little anxious.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewer invited a month, waiting

(0) Thank | w

The review speed is fast, the editing process is also faster, and the direct registration after the modification is

(0) Thank | Anonymous

article from submission to acceptance for 8 months.After the first select, the reviewer considered that the set of data was much higher than the theoretical value.After the explanation, the editorial department resubmitted the manuscript, and then minorly repaired it once, and successfully published it.Overall it is a very good journal.

(0) Thank | 早起的虫子

has been submitted for two months, still with editor, I feel very slow ah

(2) Thank | xie

Submitted in June 2016, and today (2017.6.20) has not received the notice.In December 16th, I returned to the revised draft. During the period, I have been reminded that there has been no news.Maybe luck is not good.

(0) Thank | Wang

Very fast, JCRQ1 journal, quasi-TOP journal

(3) Thank | KKK

Review time also see reviewers, I returned the news one month.At present, I have encountered the fastest journals, reviewers, and editors who are very nice and will continue to support them in the future.JCR District Journal.

(3) Thank | Niming

Journal is very good, dealing with manuscripts is very fast, it is worthy of top journals, of course, luck is also one aspect.Submission on November 18, 16;The opinion was given on December 17, 16th, moderation revision, two months of modification time;Submit revised draft on February 15, 17th;Accepted on February 17;Published online March 6.

(2) Thank | wancen

has received an article on the bias mechanism.Submitted for 10 months, overhauled 2 times, minor repairs 1 time.The reviewers were very rigorous and responsible. The author made two trials and answered more than 70 constructive comments from reviewers and editors.Seriously changed 2 overhauls and 1 minor repairs, and edited the notice to accept.Personal feelings are theoretically very innovative.The details of the test are also stricter.If the content of the submission is not a hot spot, the processing will be slower, but the letter will be asked to the journal editor, and each time you are enthusiastic to reply.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Submission for 6 and a half months has been Under Review, issued a reminder letter consultation, editor-in-chief back to the mail said that there is a reviewer has not returnedThe review comments were re-reviewed by the drafter. After one month, they were given a minor repair, and they were repaired in one week. After half a month, they received it, which took a total of eight months.In general, it is still relatively easy, but the submission cycle is too long, and some sections are less efficient in editing.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

very good old-fashioned journals, directly acceptd after overhaul.

(0) Thank | qswghn2013@163.com

Do you want this journal to receive a review article? Just gave this journal a review article, November 7On November 14th, the editorial department said that the technical review had not passed, and changed the format. Today, on November 19th, it has been in the state of the editor. I don’t know how long this state will last for the time to select for this journal.The worm has good results

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This is the best journal of my current situation. The reviewer has a good opinion and the review is very strict. The reviewer reviews the manuscript and edits the manuscript speed.All of them are very fast, the Chinese Academy of Sciences District 1 journal, the impact factor of 2.367 in 2012, the 5-year impact factor is greater than 3. Very good journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Upstairs is not exactly right, when the journal was foundedIt's a long time, but the level of articles published is generally different, compared with SBB, it is difficult to rise to a journal. The influence factor is big.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is very good, it is the old soil.In terms of the impact of the factors, it can be seen that the 2009 soaring, soon can be included in the Chinese Academy of Sciences journal, the submission is not very good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous