X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 38468 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleREACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsREACT FUNCT POLYM
ISSN1381-5148
h-index87
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.100.7080.974
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q187 / 398
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q234 / 115
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Biochemistry
Q2144 / 407
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Polymers and Plastics
Q123 / 154
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q147 / 287
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: General Chemical Engineering
Q154 / 281

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/502694/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/REACT
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1995
Annual Article Volume218
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1381-5148%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 7 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Data from Elsevier: 23%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.9 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS: Write a review
Author: luozw1989


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-12 17:59:54
6/Jan/2020, submission; 2/Mar/2020, minor revision; 6/Mar/2020, the revision submitted; 7/Mar/2020, accept.

(0) Thank | luozw1989

Author: nalifei


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-16 16:02:12
20190315 Submission, under review within a week, and then there was no news for 115 days. The paper was urged twice but got no reply. 20190715 manuscript was rejected. I understand that the level of my paper is average, but the efficiency is too slow...

(0) Thank | nalifei

Author: 沿途看看


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-26 13:49:01
Overall the submission process lasted for three and a half months and the speed was OK.

(0) Thank | 沿途看看

Author: 沿途看看


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-26 13:49:01
2018-10-29: submitted to the journal; 2018-11-04: with editor; 2018-11-06: under review; 2018-12-04: under evaluation. In the meantime, two emails were received on 12-05 and 12-31: Reviews complete and decision pending for your manuscript. There must be some arguments, so it was sent for a third reviewer. 2019-01-03: major revision invitation. In the meantime, two emails were received on 2019-01-21 and 2019-01-27, urging for the revised submission. 2019-1-31: revision submitted to the journal; 2019-02-01: with editor; 2019-02-16: accepted; 2019-02-16: send to publication. I felt that the speed was very fast from submission to editor to the beginning of the review. However, it happened to be the Spring Festival in China after our revised submission, and the manuscript state had not been changed for half a month. It is estimated that it had not been sent for review and accepted directly. It took 3 and a half months in total. The speed was not bad.

(1) Thank | 沿途看看

Author: 874324901@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-13 09:56:08
to be sent out for two months before being submitted for trial. This process is very tough, and a reminder letter is also written in the middle, and it will be reviewed one month after the trial.The draft comments were revised one month and accepted two days after the select.The process is very tortuous, but the ending is good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 874324901@qq.com

Author: wangyixi301@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-08 16:57:29
is too slow, and it has been rejected for nearly half a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wangyixi301@163.com

Author: 874324901@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-15 09:39:36
has been throwing out for nearly two months, has been With Editor, and has written a reminder letter in the middle.too slow!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 874324901@qq.com

Author: 延期者


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-22 16:32:51
is too slow, the first time I selectd out in the hands of the editor for more than a month, and then reviewed for more than a month, the opinions went to the editor and actually stayed for ten days.After the revision, I re-submitted it, and it is still twenty days in the hands of the editor.I really don't know what the editor is doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It’s unfortunate that the instructor who meets the water and water needs to be judged and can’t guide him.
Show Review in Original Language
(123) Thank | 延期者

Author: 1197377600@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 16:31:21
After the submission, a long wait, waiting for people to collapse!Modified three times, but fortunately it was eventually acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1197377600@qq.com

Author: 1197377600@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 16:31:15
After the submission, a long wait, waiting for people to collapse!Modified three times, but fortunately it was eventually acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 1197377600@qq.com

Author: jason


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-08 10:22:00
has more than one month to reviewThe comments of the draft, after the revision, submitted more than a month after the submission, still no news, too slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | jason

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 03:35:00
submitted on May 30, 2013, and then it is a long wait, received changes on August 11Comments, overhaul, the first reviewer gave seven comments, and the second reviewer gave 15 comments.However, I feel that the two reviewers don't understand the aspect I am doing. It is really the kind that I asked him to explain to him. Therefore, although there are many comments, it is not difficult to answer.Seriously, I really answered each question point to point. The second reviewer also proposed to make up an experiment. However, because the laboratory equipment was really limited, the euphemistic apologize to the reviewer.On August 21st, I uploaded the revised draft. Hey, on the 23rd, I received the news unexpectedly. Accept, so fast, take advantage of the heat, and check it out!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-27 09:19:00
Show Review in Original Language
(42) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-28 10:27:00
Is it always waiting with the editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(62) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-28 18:51:00
finally got the result after a long wait, received after the overhaul! Fortunately, before the graduation review!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-22 16:07:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-02 08:11:00
contributed for two months, has been with editor, write to ask, I finally have to retract the draft
Show Review in Original Language
(68) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-08 20:30:00
I have been submitteding for 40 days, or with the editor, I don’t know the situation of the horse...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-26 09:27:00
6 Half a month, still did not move, urging 2 times, changed the reviewer twice...Still, too lazy to manage
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-16 23:35:00
editing efficiency is very high, worth a good journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 16:04:00
The review is very fast, only 8 days from the select!!The editor has a novel request for the article.If the result is better, the structure is relatively new and worth submiting!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-10 15:52:00
has been 5 months, still in the trial · I am too lazy to manage it
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-15 22:41:00
just received an article, the editing efficiency is quite high.That is, the reviewer is a bit perverted. It should be a small Japanese. If he looks bad, let you change!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-12 15:18:00
Reviewing the Japanese is the main body, the article requirements are relatively fine, like to buckle details.The results of the study should be supported by detailed results.The feedback is still relatively fast, with a special language editor.Still worth a select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-01 15:09:00
Why is it so slow? I have been audited for 3 months... I have graduated from the article... 3 months and a half.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service