My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service


   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title

Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 15761 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal Title AbbreviationsRAPID PROTOTYPING J
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q164 / 340
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q1119 / 585

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)9.20%
Official Websitehttps://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/1355-2546
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rpj
Open AccessNo
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume181
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1355-2546%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: >12 Week(s), or Invited contributions
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
  Reviews on RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL: Write a review
Author: welding

Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision

Write a review

Reviewed 2019-10-30 10:34:04
Submitted in March and the manuscript was reviewed for 4 months. I urged it, and they said that only one reviewer comment came back, and let us recommend another one reviewer. It was required to make a major revision in the fifth month, but it was actually mentioned to be similar to another literature. I basically didn’t revise the manuscript, and just pointed out the difference between the two in the response letter. It took two days to fix it and then I submitted it. After that, it was ‘awaiting EA checklist' for another month. After the urge, the editorial assistant replied that thanks to me for urging, and he immediately sent it for review. A few days later, it was accepted. The overall speed is too slow, but my manuscripts are average, and this journal is quite easy to be accepted. If you can tolerate the speed, you can submit to it.

(2) Thank | welding

Author: 卷儿

Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision

Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-21 11:06:24
2019/5/3, submit; 2019/5/6, in review; 2019/6/10, major revision. There was only a decision of an expert, who required a major revision. He/she affirmed the innovativeness of my work, but said that my expression was not clear. He/she asked me to restructure the article, fill in the details of method, and perform a statistically significant analysis of the specific result. He/she also denied my conclusion. Different materials and processes are needed to prove my conclusion. My personal understanding was that the experts thought my conclusion is exaggerated. I modified for one month, comprehensively revising the language, supplementing the methodology content, and adding more restrictions to the title. I minimized the conditions under which titles and conclusions were obtained. The conditions for obtaining the title and conclusion were narrowed down. Then I explained that it would be applied to other materials in subsequent work. 2019/7/16, revision submit; 2019/7/16–2019/8/15, awaiting EA checklist (This status lasted for a month). My guess is that the editor was on summer vacation and I sent a reminder letter without reply. 2019/8/15–2019/9/11, in review; 2019/9/11, awaiting editor decision (I thought this status was just temporary, but it actually lasted for a week); 2019/9/18, accepted.

(1) Thank | 卷儿

Author: welding

Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown

Write a review

Reviewed 2019-08-14 20:33:03
I submitted it in March 2019, and there is no news so far. It has been 5 months. It’s really slow. My classmate’s 6 SCI articles have been published. Why is this so slow? Whoever submitted will regret it.

(4) Thank | welding

Author: Anonymous

Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)

Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-15 08:38:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous

Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)

Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-29 10:12:00
Online submission URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rpj
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page

Start your review of [RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL]:

Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service