X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

NANOTECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[NANOTECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 165996 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNANOTECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOTECHNOLOGY
ISSN0957-4484
E-ISSN1361-6528
h-index180
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.101.0260.868
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q162 / 585
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q186 / 460
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q149 / 367
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q1108 / 670
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q166 / 398
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q240 / 148

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.90%
Official Websitehttp://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://atom.iop.org/atom/usermgmt.nsf/EGWebSubmissionWelcome?OpenForm&ISSN=0957-4484
Open AccessNo
PublisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1990
Annual Article Volume1004
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0957-4484%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NANOTECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on NANOTECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 2D materials


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-08-07 08:05:17
June 1st, submitted to 2D materials; June 11th, notification of rejection after review, but there was no reason for rejection (I was annoyed and sent email to ask, but no response was received). The editor suggested us to transfer it to Nanotechnology. It was in a hurry, so we transferred to Nanotechnology on June 17th, and the first review opinions were received on June 19th (it was actually the opinions given by 2D Materials, one agreed to accept it after a major revision, and one required a major revision without indicating a rejection. I was confused again with the process in 2D Materials); June 25th, we replied to the comments of the first review, without doing any additional experiments, and we were completely arguing! On July 5th, I received the comments of the second review, and one of the reviewers still felt that I did not explain clearly… On July 10th, we continued to argue, and the opinions are basically unchanged; on July 23rd, the editorial office sent a message to notify the acceptance! Well... Hope it can help you.

(10) Thank | 2D materials

Author: tongl2012


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-16 10:41:22
I'm used to looking at the submission experience of the seniors on LetPub before choosing a journal and submitting a manuscript. 2018.10.08 with editor, 2018.10.15 in peer review, 2018.12.18 Moderate Revision (one reviewer, reviewers 6 comments, requiring minor revisions), 2018.12.28 revision submitted (Maybe it’s due to the Christmas holiday, the revised manuscript has not been processed, so it takes a little longer. We wait anxiously), 2019.01.24 provisionally accepted (Don’t worry about this status, although it is a “temporary acceptance”, it does mean being accepted. They just want to be responsible. The editor needs to check whether the materials are complete. If not, they will contact you, but the article will be accepted), 2019.01.29 formally accepted, 2019.01.30 available online (The received manuscript can be downloaded online, and the DOI number of the article will be Given), 2019.02.05 Proof, 2019.02.25 Published. For this time, the review speed is not very fast. The articles published in Nanotechnology are still more like in physical area. It is best to have a good theoretical explanation, but theoretical calculation articles are also welcome.

(13) Thank | tongl2012

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-15 18:55:00
The review cycle was only 15 days. It was very fast. I feel that my work is very meaningful and provides a deep understanding of a new phenomenon. Some of the reviewers’ comments were not painful and did not mention any key problems.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: xiaonuli


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-10 23:07:50
recently accepted an article, the revised comments given in the first month, minor repair.The editing process is very fast, and the review comments are pertinent. If the quality of your work is OK, it is recommended to try.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xiaonuli

Author: xwgd8@mst.edu


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-02 12:19:33
10.3011.25 Received two minor repairs11.28 Reply, receive on the same dayA very fast journal, IF has dropped
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | xwgd8@mst.edu

Author: yabeiwu


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-26 16:39:37
In the summer vacation, I transferred a few reviewers. In the end, only one responded to the comments and responded a little. Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yabeiwu

Author: 哈哈笑


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-30 13:35:43
This year's second district standard "-", next year will be three districts
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 哈哈笑

Author: SS


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-28 20:59:46
I am messyCast, the first day of the select, the second day according to
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | SS

Author: noway


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-14 15:21:50
Also this journal has the same difficulty as Zone 1..I laughed and died..
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | noway

Author: honor


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-03 09:49:45
This is a magical journal that is difficult.Although it has dropped to Zone 2, it is the same as the difficulty of Zhongyi District!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | honor

Author: baijiaqix@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-14 16:03:22
The journal of Bunker, which was reviewed for two months, both reviewers gave minor repairs, and the result was rejected by the editor.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | baijiaqix@163.com

Author: HanneGuarder


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 15:09:00
5.12Submission7.17 Receiving3 reviewers, first-instance, 2 positive, minor repair; one rejectionDuring the period, a lot of changes were made, and each reviewer’s comments were replied one by one and carefully revised.A manuscript that was thrown out before the final exam.Fortunately, I received it!
Show Review in Original Language
(67) Thank | HanneGuarder

Author: Nanotechnology


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-14 19:13:53
influence factor has dropped!Do you give some strength?
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | Nanotechnology

Author: 526813715


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-24 08:59:32
3 Submitted at the beginning of the month,Submitted for about 10 days,1 month for the first review, overhaul, two reviewers, the opinions are more positive,Repaired in 25 days,Received after another month.The efficiency of the second trial was low, but it was accepted, otherwise it was a big loss
Show Review in Original Language
(27) Thank | 526813715

Author: hahahaha


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-30 22:10:06
Reviewers are very nice.The questions are very good.excitement.Aiming at this journal 2 years ago, it is said to be Zone 1.Hey, I recently found it to be Zone 2.A little tragedy.When is the impact factor broken 4?I am eager to wait
Show Review in Original Language
(35) Thank | hahahaha

Author: nini


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-26 06:37:18
The partition is wrong?Engineering Technology Zone 1,Materials Science: Comprehensive Zone 2,Physics: Application Zone 2,Nanotechnology 3 District
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | nini

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-16 14:29:00
11月2No. Submitted today, November 16th, the status of the manuscript is still manuscript received!what's the situation?Is it a trial or a rejection?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-17 17:28:00
11 selectd, the status has been Manuscript Received until now, there is no movement, do not know what state to go.There is a link to the copyright agreement in the middle.The status of submissions on the Internet is not the same as that of your own. Hey, waiting for graduation
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-17 07:42:00
Submitting manuscripts are very regular journals
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-02 22:43:00
21, the next day to the ID.Up to now, still manuscript received...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-08 21:11:00
submitted for 3 and a half months, finally told me, similar to the previous work, do it early.This journal is inefficient, and it is not reviewed. Please submit it carefully
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-29 21:38:00
24, and give it to the ID.The result is five days, still manuscript received. What do you mean!Egg pain
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-29 21:10:00
This journal has been in the journal for two years. The opinions of the three reviewers only returned two brothers and then changed the select.The speed is very fast, more than 20 days, less than a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-24 09:47:00
What broke the journal, I asked me to change it, and I refused it. I lost more than three months and made a decision for nearly a month.Efficiency, too pit people
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-03 21:14:00
Although the submission system is relatively simple, it is more practical.Feeling reviewers and editors are more responsible, and the speed of review is faster.Only IF has not been very high, but it also belongs to the 1st area of ​​engineering technology category. There are innovations that can be submitted.DateTask descriptionDeadline date/Status02/07/2013Optional author amendments09/07/201313/06/2013Revised manuscript to refereeReport received
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [NANOTECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service