JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS

The editor is slow. A few months for the review period.

(4) Thank | zzq

Real pit, 7 months refused to draft, refused to draft the reason is that the analysis is not deep enough, you are giving a revised suggestion, Zhejiang University's Xiao editor, huh,

(25) Thank | are you sha diao?

18.12.11 submitted to journal18 .12.16 with editor18.12.21 under review18.12.22 under editor evaluation19.1.02 minor revise19.1.06 revision submitted to journal19.1.08 revised submitted to journal (highlights word modification)19.1.11 with editor19.1.16 acceptThe speed is really fast, edit: Hiroki Sakaguchi

(0) Thank | jingjingdadada

contributed on December 7, 2018Rejection on January 7The time of change in the middle has been forgotten.My article is faster than my brother, and his revisions have been made for several months.It should be to look at luck.

(2) Thank | happy healthy humble

November 18th SubmissionSubmitted one week laterThere is no news for reviewing for more than a month. There is no change in the intermediate state.Speed ​​is really slow

(2) Thank | 113

I selectd on April 18, 2018. During the period, I received the review comments on October 12, and three of the four reviewers gave it.The comments were revised and considered to be innovative. There was a rejection of the manuscript. The reason for the rejection was very simple and rude. The editor finally gave the opinion of the overhaul. The four reviewers submitted almost 30 comments. I made up the characterization and experiment and answered 4000.The word was sent back in the first 2 days of the deadline (November 11th), and then the editor sent it to the external trial. On December 7th, the editor accepted my manuscript.About 2 days or so, my manuscript has been online.The editor who handled my manuscript was an Indian. The person who sent the external trial was basically an Indian. I made a bunch of representations. Although the process was very long, I accepted it quite happily!I think it is important to pay attention to this journal. Don't push the manuscript. The draft is easy to cool.mutual encouragement!

(8) Thank | chentu

09.07 submitted to journal09.14 with editor09.25 under review10.08 under editor evaluation10.09 minor revise10.12 revision submitted to journal10.14 with editor10.18 acceptI am anxious to apply for the article, I feel that the speed of review is not as slow as everyone said, and the efficiency is quite high, thanks to UWaterloo's Holger Kleinke!

(7) Thank | EJFaker

8.239.6 with editor9.12 under review9.19 Overhaul9.29 repair10.15 minor repairs10.17accept

(1) Thank | 曲一心

Last year's minor repair was dragged for 11 months, too slow, and has not been selectd for this issue.The select was fairly smooth, and the review speed was very good. It took 7 days to complete the external review. It took less than two months to accept it. The amount of submission was mainly spent in the editor’s hand.20180814 submitted20180828 with editor20180903 under review20180910 under editor evaluation20180911 major revision20180919 submitted to the journal20181001 accepted

(8) Thank | cangture

2018.08.04 submitted to journal2018.08.22 with editor2018.08.28 under review2018.09.04 under review2018.09.10 under editor evaluation2018.09.16 revise2018.09.20 Revision Submitted to Journal2018.09.22 Sent Back to Author2018.09.22 Revision Submitted to Journal2018.09.24 With editor2018.09.25 AcceptIt may be due to a large backlog of manuscripts, which takes a long time in the early stage, but it is still very fast after the trial.

(14) Thank | 起床困难户

7.68.19 Overhaul Term of one month9.18 return9.22Feeling still very efficient

(1) Thank | Akari10032

Excuse me, how long is the under review of this journal?

(0) Thank | 萌

I really feel that this journal is not up to date compared to other journals.I hope to speed up the review, there should be more articles to post

(0) Thank | xcuwlj

submit for a long time, but the efficiency is very fast in the later period. After the revision of the manuscript, I will receive it immediately. Thanks to the cook editor, very Nice!

(3) Thank | 菁聪年华

Submitted on May 30, received on September 10, and overhauled twice in the middle, only received

(1) Thank | 916105989@qq.com

Three months have not received the results, no more than Kaobo can not use the true heart slow in this life if you do researchI will consider this journal again, sad!

(3) Thank | 等文章考博那！！

Initial Date Submitted May 26, 2018Accept Sep 04, 2018

 All the way to the twists and turns, selected a material chemistry reviewer, a total of three reviewers, a life and death is not uniform, the comments can be written more than one article, and finally even the editor ignored him, the third trial directly accept

(5) Thank | 麦爱洲

6.25 Submission, intermediate submitted to journal 3 weeks, then one week to give advice, 8.5 major revision, 8.25 repair, 8.30 accepted.quite fast.

(3) Thank | zhizaibide

6.13 contribution, then the middle has beenSubmitted to journal7.8 with editor7.13 under review8.6 major revision8.17 submitted to journal8.22 accept

(3) Thank | 13273027056@163.com

Really slow, 6.4 submission, 7.4 underReview, still under review. I don't want to visit this journal anymore.

(1) Thank | yanhuicao@yeah.net

Aug 02, 2018 Submitted to journalAug 17, 2018 With EditorAug 20, 2018 RejectThank you for your interest and submission to "Journal of Alloys and Compounds". Unfortunately, after an initial evaluation, I feel your manuscript is not appropriate for this journal's readership.Yours sincerely,Livio BattezzatiEditorJournal of Alloys and Compounds

(4) Thank | 心塞塞

Has been selectd for 13 days or submitted to journal, hope good luck

(12) Thank | 292593390@qq.com

Despise this journal.The submission has been submitted to journal for more than 20 days, and the received mail was rejected today, saying that it does not meet the scope of their journal.If you don't meet the scope, you should know the title. The film has taken me off for more than 20 days and delayed the time!

(39) Thank | 赶时间的书生

How is this journal?It’s so slow now, I selectd a very fast one, and now I’ve been submiting for 20 days. I don’t even have an article number. I’m anxious

(4) Thank | jacfey

2018.0530 submitted2018.0623 with editor2018.0623 under review2018.0706 major revision2018.0726 resubmit2018.0731 with editor2018.0803 under reviewThe three reviewers felt that the first one was an editor. All three were more positive about innovation. They didn't ask a question. All of them were given revision opinions. It is obvious that 23 reviewers carefully read the article.The big and small opinions have come up with a total of 30 articles and are very responsible.This journal feels more demanding for innovation.Go back to repair, hope for good luck.

(3) Thank | MarkDeng