IONICS

Only 11 days for review. 4 reviewers. Numerous comments.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review was quick, after the review became the waiting EIC decision, and then changed back to under review.Looks like a lot of reviewers, opinions are not uniform.I don't know how long it will take to know the end result.

(1) Thank | 方法方法

Submitted on May 17, 2018Overhaul on June 17, 2018Revised on June 26, 2018Received on June 30, 2018The speed is very fast, the journal is good!Although the display here is the four districts, the division of Kerui Wei'an is the second district, and the JCR division of the web of science also has the direction of the second district.Our school published an article focusing on the division of Kerui Wei'an.

(0) Thank | 58911112@qq.com

Submitted on May 17, 2018Overhaul on June 17, 2018Currently being revised.

(1) Thank | 58911112@qq.com

The first trial was very fast, one month gave the results, the second trial was minor repair, and the third trial was received, but the second and third trials were too long, and they were all sent to the letter in nearly two months.The final total of nearly six months is the longest experience in electrochemistry.

(12) Thank | 1095519225@qq.com

1 month reviewSubmitted after 1 month of overhaulReceived after 1 and a half months

(1) Thank | haha

Very good journals, review and rework are all one month, and they will be received directly after modification.IF is rising year by year.

(1) Thank | niming

The review speed is quite fast. After three weeks of submission, the comments will be revised. Although there are ten comments, there are not too many problems, and then there are other things that are busy.It will be submitted to the revised draft in three months and will be received directly after two weeks.

(0) Thank | weibiao_li@163.com

Journal can also, the speed of review is generally, more than two months, is the reviewThere are too many manuscripts, and I have selectd for one of the two articles. If there is not much innovation, the current impact factor can be more than 1.8. If the review requirements are strict, it is estimated that the possibility of rising is very large

(1) Thank | Tank

Journals are also available, the review speed is average, more than two months, is too many reviewers, selectd for two articles, if not much innovation can be the currentMore than 1.8 impact factors, if the review requirements are strict, it is estimated that the possibility of rising is very large

(1) Thank | Tank

selectd for more than a month, still no news

(1) Thank | 雪

Requires rigorous reviewMore opinions, overhauled one month later, two months after returning, reminded once to accept.Innovation is general but rich in content and expandable.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted in the first half of the month, and oversaw the comments in mid-May, and returned to the overhaul in early July, and accepted it in early August.A total of six reviewers.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The latest impact factor 1.674 is not bad.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The requirements for the paper are not very high, but there are more reviewers, and you can consider the depth of the paper.2 months after the select is overhauled, directly received after the modification, a total of 3 months to get.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Good luck, half a month to the news, minor repair.The impact factor of this journal has been rising in recent years, and it is expected that it will reach 2 or more. It is worth looking forward to and contributing.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The speed is too slow, and it will not give a message for three months after the overhaul. It is really a good journal to train people's endurance!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After submission, return to overhaul one month, modify and submit again in half a month, receive directly after more than two months, total duration of three months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

4 months, 2 reviewers in the first instance, 5 reviewers in the second instance, the impact factor is not high but very formal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1Submission No. 12, overhaul on February 15th, minor repair in April, received in May.Strict requirements, two reviewers in the first instance, and four reviewers in the second instance.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

A journal of too rubbish, eight reviewers, five agreed to modify, the result is rejected, and the reasonNot enough, really perverted, everyone do not select

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is very slow now, it is recommended that the shrimps who need articles immediatelyStill cautious, I submitted the manuscript on January 30, revised on May 2 (5 reviewers), re-submitted after the revision on May 18, and responded on June 7 (8 reviewers, 6 agreed to receiveA still do not agree, a neutral) No. 8 June delivery again, No. 9 received.Nearly half a year before and after

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The draft submitted in late November last year, three reviewers before and after.The first comment came back about 2 months, which may be the reason for the Christmas holiday, two reviewers, overhaul; another 2 months, the second opinion came back, one reviewer got it, the other did not, andLooking for the third reviewer, the result was another overhaul; it was two months, and the result was received directly...The overall feeling is not very demanding for the innovation of the work, but to compare the system, the overall feeling is generally required for the language (although this is also possible, the reason why my other article is rejected by the journal is that the language is not good (╯_╰)╭),Strictly in accordance with the format requirements.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd for nearly a month, still no news ah

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I selectd for two months, and there is still no news, what is wrong???

(0) Thank | Anonymous