X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 67047 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE PHOTONIC TECH L
ISSN1041-1135
E-ISSN1941-0174
h-index143
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.500.9451.212
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q1122 / 670
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Q138 / 183
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q147 / 234

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.90%
Official Websitehttp://photonicssociety.org/content/photonics-technology-letters
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pho-ieee
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume411
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1041-1135%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 66%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS: Write a review
Author: 光学photonics


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-09-02 19:01:12
There were two reviewers, the first reviewer gave some general suggestions, and some suggestions were given from the general direction. Major revision and resubmission were required in the comment; The second reviewer was professional, and the comments raised were very critical and practical, and minor revision was required. The editor gave two months for moderate revision. The manuscript was submitted after revision, the first reviewer had no questions, and the second reviewer thought that one question was not clear enough, and required one more round of moderate revision. It was accepted after a revision. The review was quite strict, even if there was a problem, it would be returned to the reviewers for review. The speed was very fast, and the review comments were returned within 20 days in the first round. However, it took two months for two rounds of review, and it took less than two months in total. 2020.7.2, submitted; 2020.7.21, moderate revisions requested within 2 weeks; 2020.7.29, with editor; 2020.7.30, with reviewer; 2020.8.6, moderate revisions requested within 2 weeks; 2020.8.8, with editor; 2020.8.18 with reviewer; 2020.8.23 accept as is.

(2) Thank | 光学photonics

Author: 小达人


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-01-31 22:31:21
I really do not recommend you submit here. An article of mine about optics has been reviewed for 9 months. Before my submission, I saw that it takes a long time to review the manuscript. I personally thought that my research direction was not that unpopular, and it would not take so long to review the manuscript. However, it took 9 months already... I have urged many times during this period, the editor has never responded to my emails. I am so amazed... Overall I feel that the editor is not very responsible, at least not used to checking emails. I’ve sent too many emails intermittently within two months. But he replied to none of them. It is recommended that friends who are anxious to choose other journals to submit. The 9-month review cycle is really unaffordable...

(9) Thank | 小达人

Author: 江南雪


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-08-07 09:48:13
This journal was very good, the review speed was fast, the reviewers were professional, and the opinions given were very important to the improvement of the article. I submitted it on April 9, 2019; two months was given for major revision on April 29, 2019; I submitted it after revision on June 19, 2019; it was accepted on June 22, 2019; it was officially published on July 19, 2019; it was included in an issue on August 1, 2019; it was included in retrieval system on August 7, 2019.

(16) Thank | 江南雪

Author: 你猜我是哪只喵


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-06 23:52:10
Although the impact factor is around 2, the review is really too strict. The first round of two reviewers, the opinions are very professional.

(0) Thank | 你猜我是哪只喵

Author: sunworld


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-14 09:02:11
2018.5.25 select, 2018.5.29 with editor, 2018.7.1 was rejected.However, the 2 reviewers affirmed the innovative nature of the article. The editors said that if they are willing to modify the opinions of the reviewers, they are welcome to re-enter.There is a glimmer of hope, after the modification, 208.9.10 select, 2018.9.13 with editor, 2 reviewers, 2018.10.8 return to the review comments, given two weeks of revision, carefully revised, 2018.10.17 hi.Overall evaluation, PTL review efficiency is high, review draft is careful, the requirements for innovation are high, and the quality of journals is good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sunworld

Author: 秦朝


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-01 15:32:47
Overall, submitting PTL is a pleasant experience. The reviewers responsible for my manuscript are very careful, and the comments are very pertinent and the attitude is very good.This is also my first time the article was accepted, and I am grateful to PTL.Process: In June, it will be returned to the major repairs at the end of July, submitted in September, revised in early November, and acceptd after 2 weeks.It should be noted that although the PTL is expressly fast, but because of the more detailed carvings, the reviewers have higher requirements, and the overall time spent will be longer than expected.When collecting the submission experience of the former worms, it was found that it took four to six months to be acceptd. The distance was quite rough. If you need to publish quickly, please choose carefully.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 秦朝

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-03 19:06:29
This journal has a very high degree of recognition in optics, and the journal has a very fast review, but the review is very strict and the requirements are very strict. In addition to the reviewer, the editor will also ask some questions.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 满天的星


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-14 18:55:02
PTL is indeed the top publication of optoelectronics and optical communication. It has been the 2nd district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but it has shown a downward trend in recent years.It has dropped to Zone 3, although there has been some growth this year, around 2.4, but it is estimated that it will be the third zone.The experience is as follows: 1. The review is extremely strict, and the minor repair will be sent back to the reviewer;2, the speed of editing and processing is okay, but still slower than OE, OL, generally have the final result within 8 months;3. In recent years, not only must there be innovation, but the workload also needs to be guaranteed;4. The requirements for English are relatively high. My articles are used for overhaul-medium repair-small repairs; of course, there are also revisions after rejection.
    I hope to contribute to everyone!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 满天的星

Author: ahskfhwoiiehg


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-05 10:27:37
Sometimes reviewers are quite pitted...Speed ​​is actually very secure2018 3.08 Submitted2018 3.09 with editor2018 3.17 with reviewers2018 4.04 under review2018 4.05 Moderate revisions12018 4.13 with editor2018 4.13 with reviewer2018 4.27 under review2018 5.01 Moderated s2018 5.15 with editor2018 5.16 with reviewer2018 6.04 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ahskfhwoiiehg

Author: lf5322@163.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 09:39:10
Although the impact factor is around 2, the review is really too strict.The first round of ae gave the extensive revision, which is resubmission, and the modification time is two months.The second round of ae gave the pronunciation revision, mainly the language needs to be improved.The third round of minor revision, but asked us to list the simulation parameters.The label of the image and other issues.Received directly after modification.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lf5322@163.com

Author: 伯格


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-07 11:59:34
After the submission, it has been with editor. After 2 months, it became with reviewer. After half a month, it became the under revision, and half a month became withEditor, after changing to awaiting decision, waited for about half a month.After submitting the first draft, I received the review comments for 4 months, and revised the submitment one week. After receiving the reply from the editor one month later, I agreed to accept but changed the format. It took about half a year from the paper to the final acceptance
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 伯格

Author: n


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-26 17:33:32
just admitted an article, I feel that the difficulty is not high, I am not optical, the content of the article is only optical engineering applications.About 5 weeks of results, reviewer comments are mostly article optimization, no professional direction problems, acceptd after minor repairs.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | n

Author: 496967566@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-12 11:46:30
submitted for two months, and now it is under review, so worry.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 496967566@qq.com

Author: Tesinghua


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-17 22:48:14
is recognized as the top journal of optoelectronics, although the impact factor has been around 2.The journal's articles are of high quality and are basically practical.In one article, the review is very strict, even if it is a minor repair, it also returns to the hands of the reviewers. The first trial time is usually about one month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Tesinghua

Author: 1211212121@qq.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-03 18:57:29
is not Zone 2, but the review is stricter than OL and OE..............
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1211212121@qq.com

Author: izheng


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-25 13:16:08
16 The draft submitted at the end of September, and the reply comments were returned at the end of October. The two reviewers gave a total of 16 questions and asked to submit them again in about ten days.It was received about a week after the submission in early November.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | izheng

Author: 964253842@qq.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-23 12:06:05
is a recognized top journal in optoelectronics. The article is short and succinct, and is readable!Top one
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 964253842@qq.com

Author: 旭哥


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-01-16 14:31:10
is faster, from submission to employment for 23 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 旭哥

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-30 17:29:00
The first time in a month, the overhaul was given and the second overhaul was given less than half a month after the third revision of the mid-repair.The problem is very sharp, to understand deeply and answer seriously.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-06 15:07:00
9月11#Submission, October 11th, mid-repair, October 29th reply, November 1st,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 10:11:00
reviewing quickly, letModified twice, and then received
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-13 22:24:00
after the submission of one and a half months of review, immediately became the reviewer for the second time, and later learned that the reason was because the two reviewers disagreed, one gaveRe-submit, one is recommended.So I found a third reviewer, and the third reviewer reviewed it for more than 2 weeks. The result was also recommended. Therefore, the comprehensive result, the editor gave a moderation revision.I gave it a two-week time to revisit it. After I got it in a week, I started to re-review it. After two weeks, I decided to accept it.The reviewer is more responsible, and the editor is also quite responsible. He will not refuse to submit or accept.It is indeed a good journal that is more professional in the field of optics.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-29 00:11:00
Because the direction of the reviewer is comparedLess, and the reviewer is more responsible, modified 3 times before and after, the total time is nearly 6 months before being accepted.Two reviewers, one with a milder attitude and one with a slightly harsher one.The first time the editor gave the major revise, the second and third times were moderate revise.In May of this year, I received a four-page article. In general, reviewers and editors are very responsible. Perhaps due to more and more submissions, the review speed is slower than before.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-18 12:46:00
俺I just selectd for IEEE photonics technology letter, two reviewers, one month for the first trial, one for rejection, one for revision, and the editor for moderation revision. The second trial is sent back to the reviewer for one month, minor revision, replyAfter receiving it directly, it took a total of two and a half months. The IEEE's journal time concept is extremely strong. The reviewer is very professional, responsible and recommended.PS: The research direction of the paper is LED device structure design
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-16 20:27:00
A journal with good reputation in the field of optics. The article is short and exquisite, and it pays great attention to innovation. Simulation and experiment can be selectd. Generally, 3 trials will be found.The manuscript, the review comments are very professional ~ the speed is relatively slow, but the voluntary payment of the page fee, the individual is still more optimistic about the journal, more submitment is beneficial, huh, huh
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service