X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 50467 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE ELECTR DEVICE L
ISSN0741-3106
h-index135
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.901.3371.582
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q185 / 693
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q137 / 246

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)12.90%
Official Websitehttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=55
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1980
Annual Article Volume459
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0741-3106%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS: Write a review
Author: IEEE Member 那个人lei了


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 11:13:39
Reviewers' opinions are very professionalsts, to systems, etc. The IEEE will organize standards for each field at regular intervals. The article has strict requirements on professional terms and expressions.

(3) Thank | IEEE Member 那个人lei了

Author: ahmdyosif_1991@hotmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-30 10:45:45
IEEE EDL is by far the best journal I have submitted my work to. The comments of the reviewers were on point and very informative and I was very satisfied with the editor's decisions. The review time was unbelievably fast. I highly recommend this journal!

24-March-2019 Submitted
10-Apr-2019 Major Revision
14-Apr-2019 Resubmitted
25-Apr-2019 Minor Revision
27-Apr-2019 Resubmitted
29-Apr-2019 Accept As Is
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ahmdyosif_1991@hotmail.com

Author: zjusjtu


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 10:00:50
11-Apr-2018 submitted23-Apr-2018 Minor Revision27-Apr-2018 revised and submitted01-May-2018 Minor Revision02-May-2018 revised and submitted02-May-2018 Accept As IsThe EDL review was very fast, from the first submission to the reception for only twenty days, and two minor repairs.This is my fourth SCI, and I can finally graduate.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | zjusjtu

Author: Jia


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-02 09:41:52
the first scientific paper writing and submission, two major revision.It took a total of 6 months.The first four reviewers, finally gave reject
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Jia

Author: Jia


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-02 09:41:37
The first scientific paper writing and submission, two major revision.It took a total of 6 months.The first four reviewers, finally gave reject
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Jia

Author: zhangxizhen01@sina.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-06 19:17:48
IEEE EDL The first submission has been received.I was worried about it for the first time, but I was finally accepted, exchanged, and encouraged everyone to submit a manuscript.20160712 contributed, the editor said that no additional materials are allowed in the submission stage.A review comment will be given in about two weeks.The review comments are very good, and the opinions put forward by the two experts are very constructive.Edited to Major Revison.20160813 Reply to the reviewer's opinion and received it within about 1 week.Both reviewers agreed to accept, and believed that the scientific and technical issues were basically no problem, a little bit of advice, and that English needs to be changed.Edited to Minor Revison.20160827 again submitted the final version, received.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhangxizhen01@sina.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-30 21:25:44
Summary: EDL should be regarded as the best journal in the field of microelectronic devices, and it is harder to select than TED and APL. The mainland has published less on it. I heard that APL has only one reviewer.The luck has a big impact).Relatively speaking, the TED focuses on the comprehensive analysis of the system, EDL focuses on innovation, or the device performance has good experimental results, which can break through the existing level.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-18 13:16:00
experienced a major revison and a minor revision, which was accepted from March 12th to June 17th and lasted for 3 months.Things are new and will be better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-13 15:37:00
experienced a major revison and a minor revision, accepted from March 20th to May 9th.Feeling a lot: 1. The submission system is very convenient to use; 2. The review speed is very fast, about under review time is 1 week, Awaiting ED preliminary decision is less than 2 weeks; 3. Reviewer review is very careful, opinion4. In the arrangement of the editor, select the experts in the field closest to the article content; 4. The system comes with Golden Reviewer for Authour selection, this
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-24 22:25:00
online submission URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 09:33:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=55
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 09:44:00
The influence is relatively large, and the review is quick.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-26 12:15:00
looks faster, but still has to prepare for it, from the first time to the final acceptance, the middle experienced a major overhaul, and then minor repairs, which lasted more than 4 months
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-08 11:03:00
Very good journal, good reputation, 09 engineering technology zone 2, the impact factor is not high, the submission process requirements are also many, especially literature citation and typesetting, but there are ready-made templates.In addition, the journal has higher requirements for innovation.The page fee is 110$/page, which is voluntary.The speed of submission is fast, and the reviewers are 2-3 people. If the manuscript is submitted, it will be sent to the review and review opinions, which will help the quality of the article.Overhaul situations sometimes lead to an additional reviewer, sometimes only the original reviewer comments.I feel that the reviewers have different personalities. After all, they are all obligated and difficult to see.In addition, when writing an article, try to quote more articles in your field, and often encounter reviewers who want to add articles. Recently, three of them have been lucky.Hope
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 电子、光电子器件
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-11-30 11:34:00
experienced a major revision & resubmission, and the manuscript was accepted.Talk about some simple situations: 1. http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl The submission is best passed through its system 2. The review cycle is about 3 weeks, and soon 3. The impact factor is not very high, but the popularity should be veryGood: In 2003, the journals in this field ranked tenth (top10), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences divided them into SCI sub-category (Electrical and Electrical Engineering) Zone 1, Major Category (Engineering Technology) Zone 2. 4. Pay great attention to the novelty and importance of work 5Should be brave enough to high-level period
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 电子及光电子器件性能理论设计及可靠性方面
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-13 15:26:00
in the field of electronic devices, influential journals, once selectd, sent directly to the editor, the feedback within one month, was rejected, ifThere is no very innovative thing, it is not easy to select in
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service