FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL

I just had a paper accepted by Food Research International. The journal’s impact factor in recent years is steadily growing, so if you have relevant data, try this journal. The good thing is that the language standards are not too high. Many people from non-English speaking countries publish their papers there, so there is no discrimination against the work of authors in non-English speaking countries, just need to minimize grammatical errors. The journal prefers to select some of the active ingredients that are currently hot, so it would help if your paper has novelty.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted to journal The time is longer, more than a month, with editor about one week, under review for three weeks, soon after the modification, three months less than online, the overall speed can be.

(0) Thank | lizzyj

submit 10 daysWith editor 40 daysUnder review 4 monthsEditor evaluation 14 daysGood slow

(1) Thank | MAS12222

I have never seen this.The review of the journal is slower and too speechless.

(0) Thank | 123443

with editor 40 days, the review has been 2 months.

(0) Thank | fredddd

The speed of reviewing junk journals is quite slow

(0) Thank | 123456

15 When the article was first selectd for this journal, it was rejected after the external trial, and then went to food chemistry for a month and a half to come back to Xiaoxiu to receive it directly. At that time, I felt that the journal was very demanding, so it was a long time.Do not select for this journal.In November last year, I took an attempt to test it. The editor quickly went outside and returned to the overhaul one month later. Since the work was dragged to the deadline, it was submitted. After half a month, it was repaired or overhauled, and it was dragged for more than 20 days.Return, minor repairs after half a month, this time submitted in 3 days, after two weeks of receiving.The overall feeling of editing is very efficient, and the external review experts are very responsible, although some opinions feel more amateur.In short, this submission is very efficient, and if it is not your own delay, it should be accepted within two months.

(2) Thank | ming

I don’t know if it’s the right direction or the experimental innovation. I once suspected that the editor’s mistake would become accepted.5.10 or so, around 5.20 external audit, 6.20 or so external review results, answer questions, submit, become accepted after one week.Calling FRI crazy call

(4) Thank | wuyingalicia@gmail.com

is just a rejected story that happened within a month: submission for 20 days, 19 days with editor, and then rejected for 25 days.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has just been invited by the editor as a reviewer, friends who need to recommend reviewers can find me, QQ: 52320980, I will treat your articles objectively, welcomeAC~

(5) Thank | Anonymous

I have to praise this journal, not because of his efficiency, but because his reviewer system is really responsible, I wrote an article two months ago.There are nearly 40 documents in the literature. The reviewers basically download and read each document. The tiny reference questions can also be found out, and at least they have been read more than 5 times. In general, they have appeared 5 times, once and for all times.Modified, the original 5200 words, response 5300 words.I did not ask for a hard injury but let me thoroughly study it.Although the overhaul is submitted now, the result is unknown, but one must be praised.

(5) Thank | Anonymous

Speed ​​is OK, from submission to reception for a total of 3 months in early June, and then with the editor, to maintain this state until the beginning of July, there is no way to write a letter to the editor.Reply on the same day, the status changes to under review.In mid-August, I returned to the revised comments for overhaul. There were 3 reviewers, and there were not many opinions.At the end of August, I changed it to repair.Received at the beginning of September.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is slow, slow, slow, slow, slow

(0) Thank | Anonymous

A.S. Sant'Ana The main person is not bad, I have also tried to review the manuscript, everyoneIf you are looking for a reviewer, you can recommend me.Key words: fruits, antioxidant, HPLC, LC-MS

(1) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for the first time in two months, and the middle has been revised once. The result given recently is directly rejected.Cool and cool.I regret to inform you that the content of your paper is not appropriate for publication in Food Research International. The research reported lacks of novelty to offer publication in Food Research Inter

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2 months to give first opinion, overhaul.Changed for a month, stepped on the point to put out the revised manuscript, and waited for two and a half months to directly accept.Feel the quality of journals is still ok in the food sector.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I don’t know if there is more and more manuscript volume. The processing speed of journals is obviously slower than that of the previous people. I am with the editor for more than a month, the editor sent a letter., said that the manuscript does not meet their journal, was rejected

(0) Thank | Anonymous

6, the submission of the 11th, June 16th as With Editor, has been this state, I do not know whether it was submitted for review?Look at the small woodworms on the comments are very fast, how do you feel so slow!Is there no news or good news?Dear God, have you encountered this situation?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

5.21Submission, I still submitted to the journal today, I don’t know what happened.Is this the speed of the great gods?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

4 was submitted on the 10th of the month and was rejected on April 28.As follows: Dear XXX, I regret to inform you that the content of your paper is not appropriate for publication in Food Research International. The research reported lacks of novelty to warrant publication in Food Research International

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It took a month to give a major repair, the highest six reviewers, four minor repairs, one refused to engage, and one did not specifically express opinions.I feel that some reviewers are very responsible and have modified the punctuation.One month's modification time, stepping back on the last two days, and waiting for another 20 days to accept, the overall feeling is still relatively fast journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted for 10 days to refuse, said that the scope is not suitable, the trial is very fast

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just got an article, I feel the journal review speed comparisonFast, one month to repair, five reviewers, one rejection, four minor repairs, the editor gave the overhaul, repaired 20 days later, accepted one and a half months later.The overall feeling is better.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has two articles, I feel that the journal is good, the review speed is fast, and the editor is also very responsible.Now the impact factor has risen to 3.15, and it is also relatively high in the food sector.The review process for the two articles is as follows: 1. January 4, 2011 Submitted to Journal January 14, 2011 With Editor; Under Review February 28, 2011 Minor revision March 25, 2011 Revision Submitted to Journal 2011 April 01

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Influence factor 升啦3.1

(0) Thank | Anonymous