Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | CARBOHYD POLYM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0144-8617 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1879-1344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 10.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405871/description#description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://ees.elsevier.com/carbpol/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Chemistry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Semimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0144-8617%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.2 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: 77% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS: | Write a review |
Author: Alexander Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-21 00:36:53 The review period for Carbohydrate Polymers is average. We submitted back in February and got word from the editor that our manuscript was accepted in mid-June. I’d recommend this journal; the editor always kept us in the loop with regards to the status of our paper. ![]() ![]() |
Author: szokearpad@chem.ubbcluj.ro Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-29 11:00:26 Submitted, 30. january, 3 weeks after first review - major revision Submitted revised version 3 weeks layer Accepted and published online by the end of March. Well done! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小胖兔 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-12-29 16:22:40 I said that I have submitted four tragedies and four articles. The fifth one is still good luck. At first, the two reviewers were overhauled and revised for more than a month.After submitting the manuscript, there was still a reviewer who was very abnormal. Let us make up a lot of data. Fortunately, I added an experiment to return. After one hour of submission, the editor received it directly.I feel that CP is getting higher and higher now, and I hope that the research level of each researcher will gradually improve, and scientific research is not easy. People who are serious are lucky! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一帆风顺早点见刊啊 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-21 19:35:09 Submitted for one month, or with editorShould I continue to wait? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小胖兔 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-10-12 09:18:17 submitted on July 31st, edited to the overhaul on September 5th, there are three reviewers, but the second reviewer gives suggestions, uploads the rework article on October 8th, and under revew on the 9th, before submiting in this journalAfter three times, I was rejected. For the fourth time, I hope that it will go smoothly. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 权威调查中 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-03 08:57:53 IF is more than five o'clock. This year, the Chinese Academy of Sciences will not be in the first district. Everyone discussed and discussed ![]() ![]() |
Author: 879393286@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-25 16:13:12 Submitted for two months, still under review ![]() ![]() |
Author: panpanng Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-18 08:55:11 Is it a month or a with editor? ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhunkey Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-04 19:57:51 Submission 2.5Major revision 4.10 First review (more than two months, moderately slow)5.1 Submission after submission5.20 minor revision5.26 Submission after submission (two weeks)6.2 accept (one week)Accept later manuscript processing faster ![]() ![]() |
Author: are Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-29 13:27:05 water can not re-water journals, do not know how the impact factor goes up ![]() ![]() |
Author: ManchangDD Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-26 15:08:49 CP is getting longer and longer, and the requirements of the editor are getting higher.The section with With editor will last for more than ten days.Our paper on synthesizing new products has undergone review by n experts, three overhauls, and one minor repair. It lasted nearly seven months and finally appeared.It is expected that the impact factor of this journal's 2018 release should exceed 5. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 遥远海滨 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-11 16:02:07 Two months to return to the review comments, four reviewers.After one month, I finished the return. Now it has been a month. The result is unknown. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 哦 yeah Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-04-04 12:31:13 Investing in JMCC, the editor said that the scope does not meet the requirements of the journal, transferred to this journal, received feedback for 20 days, and three reviewers gaveMinor repair, the result editor made the overhaul, dragged back for 20 days, and sent it out for the external trial. After one week, accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: liyoudonghh@163.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-22 18:15:22 Submitted for one month, returning comments one month, and receiving the next day after modification.It lasted for three and a half months and was very fast.The reviewer's review is very careful. As long as each comment is taken seriously, it is better to receive it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: david Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-17 21:29:56 CP journals with high quality, great influence, quick review, editor is very serious, trustworthy journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: Aaron Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-02 17:53:59 The review speed is a bit slow, it may be that no suitable reviewer has been found, but after three months, return to major revision, and modify it two months later.Finished submission, ten days later accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: Kuaima Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-24 14:17:18 Very good journal.The requirements are getting stricter.From submission to Online, it lasted 3 months and 10 days.Among them, after 45 days, one opinion returned and overhauled.Two reviewers, each mentioning more than 10 questions.The contributor carefully answered the questions of the two reviewers, including supplementary experiments, which took 25 days.After the rehabilitation, the retrial, after more than a month, finally received. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1402113428@qq.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-12 14:43:35 Don't give a letter for 3 months after submitting the manuscript. After one week, the letter will be given to the letter, overhaul, and two reviewers.After a month of repair, after 40 days, a reviewer requested a second overhaul, and after one month, he was repaired again. It is still a letter of 40 days later, minor repair.Accepted 3 weeks after the minor repair meeting.After more than 10 months, I finally accepted it smoothly.The journal is getting higher and higher. ![]() ![]() |
Author: kcor@eyou.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-27 11:08:26 This journal is not responsible for reviewing the manuscript, sometimes it is rejected only by the wrong format ![]() ![]() |
Author: fondfood@126.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-08-30 17:05:23 The article in the counter field is still very fast. The first shot is rejected, the 8.4 is changed to CP, the third is under review, and the 8.20 is returned for review., two reviewers, each of the five questions, one related to the content of the article, but also to fill the experiment, but before the experiment has been done well, but the data is not put up, the editor gave the overhaul, 8.23 repair, 8.28 noticeReceive, I am researching one, this is the first SCI, optimistic about the prospects of CP, and also thanks to the speed of CP!I wish if I broke 5! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Buyiban Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-29 08:37:17 After submission for 5 months from submission to reception: two overhauls and one minor repair.A total of five reviewers, a lot of comments.Fortunately, I finally accepted it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 123 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-24 17:16:55 The journal is good, the speed is very fast, four reviewers, 2 refused, the editor refused, and then selectd again, praying good results, personally like this journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: lsx20131120a@163.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-09 12:26:04 can't stand it for ten days. Actually still with editor is not the style of this journal. Usually only 3 days for review. Do I select for fake carbohydrate polymers? ![]() ![]() |
Author: fadudu Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-16 09:19:55 This journal has a high level and the submission speed is very fast. The editor is very responsible. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 无敌 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-09 14:38:40 The journal level is quite high, submitted a piece for 6 months, experienced two overhauls and minor repairs, and finally acceptd ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last (To Page |