X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Science Advances

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[Science Advances]Hello, you are Visitor Number 19432 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleScience Advances
Journal Title AbbreviationsSCI ADV
ISSN2375-2548
h-index72
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
25.206.0623.374
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Multidisciplinary
Subcategory: Multidisciplinary
Q13 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)1.40%
Official Website
Online Manuscript Submission
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaMultidisciplinary
Country/Area of Publication
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume1238
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2375-2548%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Science Advances】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Science Advances: Write a review
Author: yaoshunqiao


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-13 11:19:45
I really agree with this comment. I am disappointed with this journal! It is recommended that everyone carefully consider submissions. I submitted my paper in mid-January 2020, and the status showed "under evaluation" one week after submission, but it has been still in this status since two and a half months ago. As it is an open access journal featuring fast publication speed and high publication fees, the delay in this manuscript was extremely disappointing. I need to emphasize that according to the comments here, the submission experience of most people reflected sending for review was two or three weeks later after submission, which is consistent with the time claimed on the journal's homepage. However, who have similar experience with me is by no means not alone, and such examples are everywhere! Please refer to the following journal comments website: https://scirev.org/reviews/science-advances/. It is shown here that after an author submitted a manuscript, the editor rejected the manuscript two months later, only using a template without specific reasons. In Nature series journals, such as various flagship Nature journals, if the manuscript stays in the hands of the editor for more than two weeks, which are not rejected in seconds, the editors will give a detailed evaluation on the work and the reason for rejection. In the link above, we also see that another author had not received the editor's decision six months after submitting his manuscript, so he had to withdraw the manuscript!

(10) Thank | yaoshunqiao

Author: qscvgy


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-06 18:49:55
I am disappointed with this journal! It is recommended that everyone carefully consider submissions. I submitted my paper in mid-January 2020, and the status showed "under evaluation" one week after submission, but it has been still in this status since two and a half months ago. As it is an open access journal featuring fast publication speed and high publication fees, the delay in this manuscript was extremely disappointing. I need to emphasize that according to the comments here, the submission experience of most people, it was two or three weeks later to be sent for review after submission, which is consistent with the time claimed on the journal's homepage. However, who have similar experience with me is by no means not alone, and such examples are everywhere! Please refer to the following journal comments website: https://scirev.org/reviews/science-advances/ It is shown here that after an author submitted a manuscript, the editor rejected the manuscript two months later, only using a template without specific reasons. In Nature series journals, such as various flagship Nature journals, if the manuscript stays in the hands of the editor for more than two weeks, which are not rejected in seconds, the editors will give a detailed evaluation on the work and the reason for rejection. In the link above, we also see that another author had not received the editor's decision for six months after submitting his manuscript, so he had to withdraw the manuscript!

(8) Thank | qscvgy

Author: 星空无线007


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-27 17:39:20
2019.5.30 submit; 2019.7.30 reject after review; 2019.8.20 re-submit; 2019.10.22 require revision; 2019.12.09 submit revised MS; 2020.2.11 require revision again; 2020.2.22 submit revised MS; 2020.2.25 accept-technical hold. About 2–4 weeks after submission, the editor would handle it. He would also check the format errors of every modification. There were three editors, all of them would review the manuscript, and finally the deputy editor would decide whether to accept it or not. It is an open access journal, and the publication fee is $4,500. The review cycle is relatively long! However, the review is still very professional. They gave a lot of comments to the article! The impact factor should reach 16 next year.

(19) Thank | 星空无线007

Author: 七月的雪


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-02 10:18:26
Overall, the staff of Science Advances is very efficient. It took less than a week for the first editor to send the paper to a more relevant editor in the field, and the second editor completed their review in about two weeks. The opinions were very important. It was really a challenge trying to make the article better. In short, the journal’s cycle is very fast, so if you need to publish a paper for graduation or other urgent reasons, you can consider this one!

(24) Thank | 七月的雪

Author: 七月的雪


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 15:45:56
Magazine editing and text editing are very good, reviewer and nice and careful, revised a lot of grammar and lexical errors
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 七月的雪

Author: 2D materials


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-15 08:45:34
2018.9.14 submit2018.12.21394 revision2018.12.9 revision submit2019.1.22 require revision again2019.1.22 revision submit agian2019.2.15 accept-technical holdAs long as the journal article is submitted (including comments), it will be reviewed by the editorial department (several departments of the editorial department, different division of labor).After the editor's review, the deputy editor will be reviewed again, and finally decide whether the article is rejected or received.
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | 2D materials

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Science Advances]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service