| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | PHYSICAL REVIEW A | ||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | PHYS REV A | ||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 2469-9926 | ||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 2469-9934 | ||||||||||||||||
| h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 28.70% | ||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | http://journals.aps.org/pra/ | ||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | https://authors.aps.org/Submissions/login/new | ||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | |||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | OPTICSPHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICA | ||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 2476 | ||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2469-9926%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on PHYSICAL REVIEW A: | Write a review |
| Author: alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-27 16:12:34 My paper was rejected five months after submission. I’ve submitted three papers so far, all rejected, so I am a bit disappointed. In the case of the most recent one, the first round of review only had one reviewer, and the evaluation was quite good. After I revised the paper, the editor found a second reviewer. The second reviewer gave two rounds of review comments, and the process lasted a long time. Each round I had to remind the editor two or three times to get the comments back. I’m a new person in the field, and I feel I wasn’t treated fairly. The comments were superficial, not to the point, and I feel the reviewers didn’t read my papers carefully.  (4) Thank | alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn  |
| Author: 5895 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-16 14:09:26 The editor and editor of this journal is very corrupt.Pulling the gang to fight, revenge, and blatantly clear the way for academic fraud.In particular, the editor who paid the bill should resign and plead guilty. (2) Thank | 5895 |
| Author: alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-27 16:12:24 submitted out for five months, rejected, three consecutiveThis is a result, a bit disappointing.Recently, the first round of review comments has only one reviewer, and the review comments are quite good. After the reply, the editors found a second reviewer.The second reviewer gave two rounds of review comments, and the process in the middle was quite long. Each round of editors urging two or three times to reply.Because my temple is relatively small, new people in the field, obviously feel suppressed, the problem is very official, did not cut into the main points, and the papers are not deep.In short, there is serious research corruption! (0) Thank | alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn |
| Author: 0244 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-02-28 16:56:01 The editor and editor of this journal is very corrupt.Pull the gang to fight, revenge, no bottom line. (0) Thank | 0244 |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-17 11:35:31 The Journal of the University of Science and Technology is a bit bumpy. It took half a year from the time of the select to the recruitment.The main reason was that the reviewers did not know much about this piece several times, and they had 4 trials before and after, and the editors were more patient. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |