PHYSICAL REVIEW A

For people who do quantum computing, this is one of the journals that must be submitted to. The editors before and after found four reviewers to review in two batches, and the comments were very pertinent. After major revision was made, it was slightly revised later, and then it got accepted.

(7) Thank | 绘梦物语

It is the first article of my Ph.D. The article was submitted on September 23 2019. The result came back on October 23 2019, and minor revision was requested. The second reviewer was urged by the editor during the period. The revision was submitted on November 8 2019, and it was accepted on November 11 2019. I feel that the reviewers reviewed the article meticulously and professionally. My boss in American also recognizes this journal.

(5) Thank | 柚子

I don’t know what happened to those who say that Physical Review A is corrupt and bad. In short, this journal is recognized by the foreign professionals and has great influence in physics. The article without certain theoretical depth and innovation will not be accepted. The review speed was fast, and the editor was professional.

(11) Thank | hainewstar

My paper was rejected five months after submission. I’ve submitted three papers so far, all rejected, so I am a bit disappointed. In the case of the most recent one, the first round of review only had one reviewer, and the evaluation was quite good. After I revised the paper, the editor found a second reviewer. The second reviewer gave two rounds of review comments, and the process lasted a long time. Each round I had to remind the editor two or three times to get the comments back. I’m a new person in the field, and I feel I wasn’t treated fairly. The comments were superficial, not to the point, and I feel the reviewers didn’t read my papers carefully.

(4) Thank | alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn

The editor and editor of this journal is very corrupt.Pulling the gang to fight, revenge, and blatantly clear the way for academic fraud.In particular, the editor who paid the bill should resign and plead guilty.

(2) Thank | 5895

submitted out for five months, rejected, three consecutiveThis is a result, a bit disappointing.Recently, the first round of review comments has only one reviewer, and the review comments are quite good. After the reply, the editors found a second reviewer.The second reviewer gave two rounds of review comments, and the process in the middle was quite long. Each round of editors urging two or three times to reply.Because my temple is relatively small, new people in the field, obviously feel suppressed, the problem is very official, did not cut into the main points, and the papers are not deep.In short, there is serious research corruption!

(0) Thank | alfred_wl@njupt.edu.cn

The editor and editor of this journal is very corrupt.Pull the gang to fight, revenge, no bottom line.

(0) Thank | 0244

The Journal of the University of Science and Technology is a bit bumpy. It took half a year from the time of the select to the recruitment.The main reason was that the reviewers did not know much about this piece several times, and they had 4 trials before and after, and the editors were more patient.

(0) Thank | Anonymous