Grant Editing provides expert scientific consultation for your proposal. We ensure that your proposal receives language revision, as well as expert review and suggestions from a senior editor in your field (PhD or MD); each editor has a track record of successful grant submissions with major funding agencies. For flexibility, we offer two service options. The Essentials Level provides a complete, accurate language edit and a scientific evaluation of your proposal, while the Signature Level extends this evaluation to include a rigorous scientific edit of the proposal and extensive suggestions for improvement via our Editor Commentary document. This ensures that your proposal meets high writing standards in English and provides detailed revisions and suggestions for the proposal’s structure and the scientific rigor of the proposed experiments and analyses, as well as review of the accuracy and novelty of the impact statements. The ultimate goal of Grant Editing is to increase the likelihood of a successful grant submission by improving readability, clarity, and scientific rigor, as well as ensuring that the proposal meets all of your funder’s requirements and expectations.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the client accepts all recommended changes and the document is still rejected solely for errors in punctuation, spelling, or grammar, then LetPub will re-edit the document for free or provide a full refund of the editing service.
* Material added to your manuscript after the document is returned to the client or otherwise inaccessible by LetPub is not included in this guarantee.
I was very happy with the prompt and clear communication with Kathryn and her team at LetPub. We needed to get a journal cover published on a quick turnaround and they offered the best price point and clearest communication of turnaround times I could find. The journal cover itself was FANTASTIC! I’m happy to recommend them (and use them!) for future journal covers.
LetPub was great! I asked for a complete scientific editing and, despite the issues of Covid-19 pandemic, the service was extremely efficient. We needed to sort out the confusion about a new research line of pancreatic surgery. This is why we decided to write a systematic review that included dozens of extremely heterogeneous researches. What resulted was a complete and meticulous article, but similar to a "Tower of Babel" difficult to read and appreciate in its original form. During the whole process, the communications specialist’s attitude was excellent: immediate response to all requests, continuous support even after the end of the service and an incredible kindness (which is not obvious). The quality of the editing was wonderful and the article completely changed its "face" allowing us to publish it in an excellent surgical journal.
We prepared a scientific publication and sent it to a scientific journal, but there were problems with the English language. The editors of this journal recommended LetPub’s services, so we decided to give LetPub a try. Office Coordinator Marise Facher was very responsive and answered all questions. The specialists at LetPub performed very good work on our article. They amended the text and provided explanations. Very good service. Many thanks!
The editors of LetPub are very meticulous and professional. This is the second time I have chosen LetPub and I recommend it to my peers. I give a sincere praise, and I am ready for the third time.
As a whole, LetPub is highly professional in language editing, and the service is also very considerate. Thank you LetPub for its timely and effective help on the long road of my paper publication!
Before my colleague referred me to LetPub, I originally tried to polish the article myself. LetPub proved that their service is very reliable. The polishing result has also been recognized by the journal that submitted the manuscript. No reviewers found any language problems. Thank you LetPub!
The editing of LetPub articles is timely and professional. They helped change my previous work must use the "passive voice" stereotype thinking. Thank you LetPub!